Example: biology

WISC-V Interpretive Considerations for Laurie Jones (6/1/2015)

Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. pearson , the PSI logo, PsychCorp, Wechsler, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and WISC are trademarks in the and/or other countries of pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliate(s). [ / RE1 / QG1 ] WISC-V Interpretive Considerations for Laurie Jones (6/1/2015) Interpretive Considerations provide additional information to assist you, the examiner, in interpreting Laurie 's performance. This section should not be provided to the parent or recipient of the report.

Pearson, the PSI logo, PsychCorp, Wechsler, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and WISC are trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries of Pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliate(s). [ 1.2 / RE1 / QG1 ] WISC-V Interpretive Considerations for Laurie Jones (6/1/2015)

Tags:

  Pearson

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of WISC-V Interpretive Considerations for Laurie Jones (6/1/2015)

1 Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. pearson , the PSI logo, PsychCorp, Wechsler, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and WISC are trademarks in the and/or other countries of pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliate(s). [ / RE1 / QG1 ] WISC-V Interpretive Considerations for Laurie Jones (6/1/2015) Interpretive Considerations provide additional information to assist you, the examiner, in interpreting Laurie 's performance. This section should not be provided to the parent or recipient of the report.

2 Please review these Interpretive Considerations before reading the report, as they may suggest that you make changes to the report settings in Q-global. If you make changes to the report settings, you can re-run the report without being charged. This file contains two full reports: first, the Interpretive report, and second, the parent report. Be sure to separate these reports before providing them to the appropriate recipients. Test Behavior Considerations Expressive language difficulties were identified that may significantly impact verbal comprehension and auditory memory performance, depending upon the nature and severity of the impairment.

3 You have indicated that Laurie exhibited speech-related or expressive language difficulties. Her scores on verbal measures may underestimate her actual ability. Laurie displayed notable difficulties with affect and motivation during the test session. In particular, she exhibited a low energy level and poor eye contact. The degree to which these behaviors may have impacted test performance will need to be evaluated within the context of her background, presenting problems, referral reason, and chronicity of the observed difficulties.

4 Score Interpretation Considerations Performance was somewhat low on Similarities, a Verbal Comprehension subtest that required Laurie to describe how two words are similar. Difficulties with this subtest may be related to poor abstract reasoning ability, low verbal concept formation, or difficulties with verbal expression. Her performance should be interpreted in light of her performance on other Verbal Comprehension subtests. Performance was somewhat low on Vocabulary, a Verbal Comprehension subtest that required Laurie to define words.

5 Difficulties with this subtest may be related to poor word knowledge, low verbal concept formation, or difficulties with verbal expression. Her performance should be interpreted in light of her performance on other Verbal Comprehension subtests. If picture items were administered, a comparison of her performance across picture and verbal items might be informative. Performance was somewhat low on Information, a Verbal Comprehension subtest that required Laurie to answer questions about general-knowledge topics.

6 Difficulties with this subtest may be related to Copyright 2015. All rights reserved. pearson , the PSI logo, PsychCorp, Wechsler, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and WISC are trademarks in the and/or other countries of pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliate(s). [ / RE1 / QG1 ] difficulty acquiring, retaining, and/or retrieving general factual knowledge. Her performance should be interpreted in light of her performance on other Verbal Comprehension subtests. Performance was somewhat low on Comprehension, a Verbal Comprehension subtest that required Laurie to answer questions based on her understanding of general principles and social situations.

7 Her performance on this subtest should be interpreted in light of her performance on other Verbal Comprehension subtests. Difficulties with this subtest may be related to low verbal reasoning and expression or poor practical knowledge and judgment. If she appears to have specific difficulties in the area of social pragmatics, interventions should be considered. She may benefit from directed social skills training, role play activities, and social thinking interventions. Recommendation Considerations Items listed in the 'Recommendations' section at the end of the report are meant to be an aid to you as a clinician, not a substitute for individualized recommendations that should be provided by a professional who is familiar with the examinee.

8 Please read through the automatically generated recommendations carefully and edit them according to the examinee's individual strengths and needs. The recommendation section entitled 'Recommendations for General Cognitive Functioning' was included in the report because the examinee's FSIQ fell below a standard score of 90. The recommendation section entitled 'Recommendations for Verbal Skills' was included in the report because the examinee's VCI fell below a standard score of 90. The recommendation section entitled 'Recommendations for Visual Spatial Skills' was included in the report because the examinee's visual spatial skills were an area of strength relative to other areas of cognitive functioning.

9 The recommendation section entitled 'Recommendations for Fluid Reasoning Skills' was included in the report because fluid reasoning skills were an area of strength relative to her overall ability level. The recommendation section entitled 'Recommendations for Working Memory Skills' was included in the report because the examinee's working memory skills were an area of weakness relative to other areas of cognitive functioning. The recommendation section entitled 'Recommendations for Processing Speed' was included in the report because the examinee's processing speed skills were an area of strength.

10 End of Interpretive Considerations Copyright 2015 NCS pearson , Inc. All rights reserved. pearson , the PSI logo, PsychCorp, Wechsler, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and WISC are trademarks in the and/or other countries of pearson Education, Inc., or its affiliate(s). [ / RE1 / QG1 ] WISC -V Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -Fifth Edition Interpretive Report Examinee Name Laurie Jones Date of Report 06/03/2015 Examinee ID Grade 4 Date of Birth 4/01/2007 Primary Language English Gender Female Handedness Right Race/Ethnicity Multiracial Examiner Name John Smith Date of Testing 6/01/2015 Age at Testing 8 years 2 months


Related search queries