Chapter 5 Dynamic and Closed-Loop Control

← Back to document page

Chapter 5Dynamic and Closed-Loop ControlClarence W. Rowley Princeton University, Princeton, NJBelinda A. Batten Oregon State University, Corvalis, Fundamental principles of feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Models of multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) systems . . . . . . . . Controllability, Observability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State Space vs. Frequency Domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83 Classical Closed-Loop PID feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transfer functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Closed-Loop stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain and phase margins and robustness.

that the plant is modeled by a system of partial differential equations (PDEs), e.g., as with the Navier-Stokes equations, the same notation can be used. In this context, the notation q(t) is taken to mean q(t,·), where t is a fixed time and the other independent variables (such as position) vary. This interpretation of the notation

  Edps