Transcription of 02 - Evaluation rubrics
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
March rubrics :how to ensure transparent and clear assessment that respects diverse lines of evidence Judy OakdenBetterEvaluation is an international collaboration to improve Evaluation by sharing information about methods, approaches and : Edward CookDesign: work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit Prepared for: Better Evaluation With permission from the Ministry of Education, New Zealand Prepared by: Judy Oakden Judy Oakden Consultancy email: Reviewers: Carolyn Kabore Irene GuijtEvaluation rubrics : how to ensure transparent and clear assessment that respects diverse lines of evidence Judy Oakden March 2013 BetterEvaluation 2 Introduction Independent external evaluators generally have to work within a range of constraints.
The evaluation framing was informed by key aspects of School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why: Best evidence synthesis iteration (Robinson, Hohepa, & Lloyd, 2009), which was being prepared for publication at the time of the evaluation. The focus of the evaluation was the extent to which
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}