Transcription of A national clinical guideline
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: tourism industry
A national clinical guideline
Management of diabetesA national clinical guidelineMarch 2010 Updated November 2017116 KEY TO EVIDENCE STATEMENTS AND GRADES OF RECOMMENDATIONSLEVELS OF EVIDENCE1++High quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a very low risk of bias1+Well conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a low risk of bias1 -Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias2++ High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies High quality case control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal2+Well conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal2 - Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal3 Non-analytic studies, eg case reports, case series4 Expert opinionGRADES OF RECOMMENDATIONNote: The grade of recommendation relates to the strength of the evidence on which the recommendation is based.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Management of diabetes A national clinical guideline March 2010
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: