Transcription of A Stakeholder Approach to Evaluating Training
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: dental hygienist
A Stakeholder Approach to Evaluating Training
A Stakeholder Approach to Evaluating Training Fred Nickols A Stakeholder Approach to Evaluating Training Fred Nickols 2003 (DRAFT: For Review Only Do Not Cite without Permission) 1 Introduction There are probably no more widely ac-cepted realities or truisms in the world of Training than the following: When it comes to Evaluating train-ing, the dominant model is The Kirkpatrick Model (TKM). TKM is rarely implemented in its entirety and Training evaluations are usually confined to the smiles test (TKM Level 1: Trainee Reac-tions). There is widespread interest in Evaluating Training , particularly at the higher levels of TKM ( , on-the-job behavior change and busi-ness results) and in going beyond TKM ( , in determining the ROI of Training or even its societal im-pact). There exists adequate if not abun-dant knowledge and an available supply of viable tools for Evaluating Training at all levels of TKM (and beyond).
www.nickols.us fred@nickols.us A Stakeholder Approach to Evaluating Training Fred Nickols
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: