Transcription of Autonomy -v- Lynch
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: dental hygienist
Autonomy -v- Lynch
Page 1 of 23 [Doc Id] (1) ACL NETHERLANDS (AS SUCCESSOR TO Autonomy CORPORATION LIMITED) (2) HEWLETT-PACKARD THE HAGUE BV (AS SUCCESSOR TO HEWLETT-PACKARD VISION BV) (3) Autonomy SYSTEMS LIMITED (4) HEWLETT-PACKARD ENTERPRISE NEW JERSEY, INC -v- MICHAEL RICHARD Lynch AND SUSHOVAN TAREQUE HUSSAIN SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS OF MR JUSTICE HILDYARD - 28TH JANUARY 2022 This summary 1. I will summarise my key findings in the statement I am about to make. This is a public statement. However, I will also deliver by 8pm today to the parties legal representatives, but only to them, a copy of my draft judgment setting out much more fully the reasons for my conclusions. That draft will remain at all times strictly embargoed. 2. Neither that draft, nor any part of its contents, is to be made available to persons other than those on the lists notified by the parties legal representatives to me, and agreed by me. Any breach of the embargo would be a contempt of court.
17. Before giving a brief summary of the various claims, I would note some matters of terminology: 17.1. Throughout this summary, unless stated to the contrary, I use the term “the Claimants” as a shorthand to denote the Claimant making the particular claim. The Claimants do not in reality make any claims jointly.
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: