Transcription of Comparing Image Classification Methods: K-Nearest …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Comparing Image Classification Methods: K-Nearest - neighbor and Support-Vector-Machines JINHO KIM Okemos High School 2800 Jolly Road Okemos, MI 48864 BYUNG-SOO KIM , SILVIO SAVARESE Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122 Abstract: - In order for a robot or a computer to perform tasks, it must recognize what it is looking at. Given an Image a computer must be able to classify what the Image represents. While this is a fairly simple task for humans, it is not an easy task for computers. Computers must go through a series of steps in order to classify a single Image . In this paper, we used a general Bag of Words model in order to compare two different Classification methods. Both K-Nearest - neighbor (KNN) and Support-Vector-Machine (SVM) Classification are well known and widely used. We were able to observe that the SVM classifier outperformed the KNN classifier.
Comparing Image Classification Methods: K-Nearest-Neighbor and Support-Vector-Machines JINHO KIM¹ Okemos High School 2800 Jolly Road Okemos, MI 48864
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Dimensional Descriptors, WRXi OM REVC, Efficient Simulation for Strongly Coupled, Efficient Simulation for Strongly Coupled Noise-Vibration-Harshness, Time doors and windows recognition in, Time doors and windows recognition in OpenCV using, Determinant Codes, GCSE (9 1) Computer Science, GCSE (9–1) Computer Science, New Jersey Student Learning Standard for World, New Jersey Student Learning Standard for World Languages, New Jersey, Power of Images: Visual-Spatial Learners