Transcription of CONDUCTING WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Michael J. Torchia, Esq. 2007 CONDUCTING WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS Michael J. Torchia, Semanoff Ormsby Greenberg & Torchia, LLC This article focuses on threshold considerations of CONDUCTING a WORKPLACE investigation with an emphasis on the mechanics of CONDUCTING interviews. Sample forms, including sample investigative reports, are included. A. Legal Basis for WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS In 1998, the Supreme Court issued two landmark decisions that changed the landscape of sexual harassment law: Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 742 (1998). Under Faragher and Ellerth, if harassment by a supervisor culminates in a tangible employment action, such as termination or a material change in duties, the employer is vicariously liable for the actions of its supervisor, without regard to whether the employer knew or should have known about the harassing behavior.
3 Don Rabon, Interviewing and Interrogation (Carolina Academic Press 1992) Stan B. Walters, Principles of Kinesic Interview and Interrogation
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
INTERVIEWING TECHNIQUES FOR HARASSMENT, INTERVIEWING TECHNIQUES FOR HARASSMENT INVESTIGATIONS, Harassment, Techniques, 3 Employment and Placement, Employment and placement, Select2Perform Test List, Select2Perform – Test List, Request for Proposal, MRS Guidance Note on Collecting Data, Post Graduate Diploma in Criminal and Forensic