CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 164/13 In the matter between: DALUXOLO NICHOLAS SALI Applicant and NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE First Respondent PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE Second Respondent MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY Third Respondent Neutral citation: Sali v National Commissioner of the SOUTH African Police Service and Others [2014] ZACC 19 Coram: Moseneke ACJ, Skweyiya ADCJ, Cameron J, Dambuza AJ, Froneman J, Jafta J, Khampepe J, Madlanga J, Majiedt AJ, Van der Westhuizen J and Zondo J Heard on: 10 March 2014 Decided on: 19 June 2014 Summary: Section 9 of the constitution unfair discrimination age discrimination SOUTH African Police S

section 9(3) of the Constitution and adds three more, namely, family responsibility, HIV status and political opinion. But unlike section 9 of the Constitution, section 6(1) of the Equity Act does not deal separately with discrimination by the state and by a private person. The latter section prohibits unfair discrimination by all employers.

Tags:

  Constitution, South, Africa, The constitution, Of south africa

Information

Related search queries