Transcription of Ectopic Pregnancy and Catholic Morality
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Ectopic Pregnancy and Catholic Morality A Response to Recent Arguments in Favor of Salpingostomy and Methotrexate Marie A. Anderson, Robert L. Fastiggi, David E. Hargroder, Rev. Joseph C. Howard Jr., and C. Ward Kischer Abstract. Respected Catholic ethicists, namely, William E. May, Christopher Kaczor, and Rev. Martin Rhonheimer, have recently defended methods for managing Ectopic pregnancies, such as the use of salpingostomy and metho- trexate, that very few Catholic moralists previously endorsed. This article examines the arguments for the revised assessments to determine whether there are sound reasons to believe that these two methods do not constitute the direct and immediate killing of innocent human beings. National Catholic bioethics Quarterly (Spring 2011): 000 000. The moral debate regarding Ectopic pregnancies has increased in recent years. Respected Catholic ethicists, namely, William E. May, Christopher Kaczor, and Rev. Martin Rhonheimer, have begun defending the use of methods for managing Marie A.
668 The NaTioNal CaTholiC BioeThiCs QuarTerly spriNg 2011 ectopic pregnancies, such as salpingostomy and methotrexate, that very few Catholic moralists previously endorsed.1 What has led to this change? Are the arguments
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
To Bioethics and Ethical Decision Making, To Bioethics, Bioethics, LEGALISED EUTHANASIA IN AUSTRALIA, Introduction to Global Health and, Introduction to Global Health and Global Health, Global Health, Harm minimization, RESEARCH ETHICS, Raised by genetically modified microorganisms, Declaration of Helsinki