Transcription of Effectiveness Technical Compliance
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: marketing
Effectiveness Technical Compliance
04/09/2018updated 4 September 2018 Table of ratings for assessment conducted against the 2012 FATF Recommendations, using the 2013 FATF MethodoTechnical ComplianceFATF MethodologyFATF RecommendationsJurisdiction (click on the country name to go to the report on )Report TypeReport DateAssessment body/bodies + FURDec/17 FATFMESEMEMEMELELEMESEMESELCLCLCCCPCPCPC A ustriaMERSep/16 FATFMESEMEMEMELELEMESEMESEPCPCLCCCPCPCPC A ustriaFURDec/17 FATFMESEMEMEMELELEMESEMESELCLCLCCCPCPCPC B ahamasMERAug/17 CFATFLEMEMEMEMEMELELELELELEPCPCCCLCNCPCP CB ahrainMERSep/18 FATF/MENAFATFMESESEMEMESEMEMEMEMEMEPCLCL CCPCPCPCLCB angladeshMERNov/16 APGMESEMELELEMELELESEMESEPCLCLCLCLCCLCLC B arbadosMERFeb/18 CFATFLEMEMEMEMELELELELELELEPCLCLCPCLCLCN CNCB elgiumMERApr/16 FATFSESEMEMEMESEMEMESEMEMELCLCCCLCPCPCPC B elgiumFURSep/18 FATFSESEMEMEMESEMEMESEMEMECCCCCPCPCLCB hutan MERNov/16 APGLEMELELELELELELEMELELENCPCPCPCNCNCNCP CB otswanaMERMay/17
Assessment body/bodies : IO1 IO2 IO3: IO4 IO5: IO6 IO7: IO8 IO9: IO10 IO11: R.1 R.2: R.3 R.4: R.5 R.6: R.7 R.8: R.9 R.10: R.11 R.12: R.13 R.14: R.15 R.16: R.17 R.18 ...
Loading..
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: