Transcription of FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE EVALUATION
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
1 #euSMARTmap Sally Randles, Mohammad Hajhashem, Monica Gonzales, Eniko Demeny, Peter Kakuk Deliverable (D ) of the H2020 SMART-Map Project FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE EVALUATION FINAL REPORT 2 Contents 1. RATIONALE: The Role and Contribution of FORMATIVE / SUMMATIVE EVALUATION ..4 2. 3. FINDINGS ..43 4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ..55 5. 6. 7. List of Tables: Table 1 Definition of each actor group Table 2 Merged dataset: 6 countries, 3 technologies, and total analyzed by stakeholder category Table 3 Schedule of the SMART-Map Industrial Dialogues Table 4 Actor categories in the sample Table 5 Technology Table 6 De-facto responsible research by actor group Table 7 De-facto responsible research by technology area Table 8 De-facto responsible innovation by actor group Table 9 De-facto responsible innovation by technology area Table 10 Awareness and recall of RRI 3 Table 11 Awareness and recall of RRI by actor category Table 12 Awareness and recall of RRI by technology area Table 13 Awareness and recall of RRI by stakeholder group Table 14 Awareness and recall of RRI by technology area Table 15 Relevance of EC 5 keys of RRI by technology area Table 16 Benefits for individuals Table 17 Benefits for society by technology area Table 18 Challenges for
Table 3 – Schedule of the SMART-Map Industrial Dialogues Table 4 – Actor categories in the sample Table 5 – Technology ... In addition, the evaluation team were keen to establish a ‘Baseline’ position at the beginning of SMART-Maps project. One important aim of the Baseline (quantitative) survey was to
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}