Transcription of Karl E. Wiegers - Process Impact
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: air traffic controller
Karl E. Wiegers - Process Impact
Copyright 2002 by karl E. Wiegers . All Rights Peer Reviews1 karl E. WiegersProcess review an activity in which people other than the author of a software deliverableexamine it for defects and improvement opportunities is one of the most powerful softwarequality tools available. Peer review methods include inspections, walkthroughs, peer deskchecks,and other similar activities. After experiencing the benefits of peer reviews for nearly fifteenyears, I would never work in a team that did not perform , many organizations struggle to implement an effective review program. Manyof the barriers to successful peer reviews are social and cultural in nature, not technical. Thisarticle explores some of the social and psychological aspects of having people review eachother s work , ways to overcome resistance to reviews, and issues regarding managementinvolvement. The suggestions provided here might help your peer review program succeedwhere others have Each Other s BackAsking your colleagues to point out errors in your work is a learned not instinctive behavior.
Humanizing Peer Reviews Page 3 Copyright © 2002 by Karl E. Wiegers. All Rights Reserved. attacked or professionally insulted will not voluntarily submit his work for ...
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
Related search queries
Financial Impact of WV, Financial Impact of, Work, Attitudes and Perceptions, Behavior, Snazzlefrag’s Organizational Behavior DSST, Of Management Control to Organizational, Of Management Control to Organizational Culture, Work Behavior, The Impact, Employee Empowerment on Perceived Organizational Reputation, The Impact of Divorce'on Children, The Roadmap to Customer Impact, Job Security and Entrepreneurship: Enemies