Transcription of OECD Environmental Performance Review Programme
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
OECD Environmental PerformanceReview ProgrammeAccountability (f)or Learning?MARKKU LEHTONENU niversity of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, FranceThe growing interest in evaluation as a new form of environmentalgovernance stems from two developments: the movement towards NewPublic Management, and the search for new policy instruments for managingcomplexity, uncertainty and plurality of values in the pursuit of sustainabledevelopment. The former holds increasing accountability as the mainpurpose of evaluation, while the latter stresses the importance of approaches are often considered as mutually exclusive, but recentliterature has underlined their complementary roles in policy making. Thisarticle examines to what extent the OECD Environmental PerformanceReview (EPR) Programme has succeeded in combining the objectives oflearning and accountability within a single evaluation framework. The EPRshave been relatively successful in avoiding the negative side-effects oftenassociated with traditional Performance measurement, but have usually failedto generate broad debate.
The OECD Environmental Performance Review (EPR) Programme The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has carried out systematic reviews of its member countries’ environmental policies since 1992. In 2000, all the member countries had been reviewed once, and the review programme entered the so-called second cycle. The ...
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}