Transcription of Practice Note – Deciding on the appropriate JCT contract
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Practice Note Deciding on the appropriate JCT contract This Practice Note is intended to provide assistance in Deciding the appropriate form of contract but it is not a substitute for professional advice. Published September 2011 by Sweet & Maxwell, 100 Avenue Road, London NW3 3PF part of Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Limited (Registered in England and Wales, Company No 1679046. Registered Office and address for service: Aldgate House, 33 Aldgate High Street, London EC3N 1DL) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
The Scottish Building Contract Committee (SBCC), a member of JCT, has in the past prepared and published Scottish Supplements to many JCT forms of contract, for use where Scots law is to apply.
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
MasterFormat, 2011, Design, Build, Contract, Design and Build Contract 2011, Design and Build Contract 2011 Design and Build Contract 2011, CONTRACTUAL PERSPECTIVES, CLAIMS THE KEY ESSENTIALS [ PART, CLAIMS – THE KEY ESSENTIALS [ PART, Design and Build, DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PART, Design-build contract documents . part, Design-Build Procurement Manual, Design-Bid-Build project delivery method, Colorado Construction Defect Law