Transcription of Preferred reporting items for systematic review …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
RESEARCHOpen AccessPreferred reporting items for systematic reviewand meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015statementDavid Moher1*, Larissa Shamseer1, Mike Clarke2, Davina Ghersi3, Alessandro Liberati , Mark Petticrew4,Paul Shekelle5, Lesley A Stewart6and PRISMA-P GroupAbstractSystematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of thereview; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understandingand appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting incompleted reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred reporting items forSystematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015).
RESEARCH Open Access Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement David Moher1*, Larissa Shamseer1, Mike Clarke2, Davina Ghersi3, Alessandro Liberatiˆ, Mark Petticrew4,
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic, A systematic review, Systematic, Independent review of the teaching, Review, Interim Guidance Note Systematic Operations, Interim Guidance Note Systematic Operations Risk-Rating Tool, Systematic Operations Risk-rating Tool, World Bank, How to Write a Rationale, To Write Your PhD Proposal: A, A Grammar of Contemporary English, Measurable Learning Outcomes