Transcription of Storage Cost and Performance Characterization Report
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: dental hygienist
Storage Cost and Performance Characterization Report
Energy Storage Technology and Cost Characterization Report July 2019 K Mongird V Fotedar V Viswanathan V Koritarov P Balducci B Hadjerioua J Alam PNNL-28866 Acknowledgments This work was authored by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, operated by Battelle for the Department of Energy (DOE), under contract number DE-AC05-76RL01830; Argonne National Laboratory, operated by UChicago Argonne, LLC, under DOE Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357; and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, operated by UT-Battelle, LLC, under DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725; and supported by the HydroWIRES Initiative of DOE s Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO).
performance, calendar and cycle life, and technological maturity. • PSH and CAES, at $165/kWh and $105/kWh, respectively, give the lowest cost in $/kWh if an E/P ratio of 16 is used inclusive of BOP and C&C costs. PSH is a more mature technology with higher rates of round-trip efficiency.
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: