Transcription of Stufflebeam's (IPP Evaluation Model Defining Evaluation
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
CHAPTER 10 Evaluation in Instructional Design: A Comparison of Evaluation Models 97. the 1960s and early 1970s, all had an Evaluation compo- Scriven (1980) also provides a "logic of Evaluation ". nent. Most included the formative/summative distinction that includes four steps. First, select the criteria of merit or and suggested that designers engage in some process in worth. Second, set specific performance standards ( , the which drafts of instructional materials are studied by learn- level of performance required) for your criteria. Third, col- ers and data are obtained on learners' performance on tests lect performance data and compare the level of observed and their reactions to the instruction.
that received the instruction did significantly better than the control group, which had received no instruction. ... whether it meets legal and conceptual guidelines, and ... Process evaluation is used to make implementation decisions. The fourth component of CIPP is product evaluation, which focuses on the success of the innovation/program in ...
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}