Example: marketing

Report of the Ohio Compassionate Care Task Force

Report of the Ohio Compassionate Care Task Force CONTENTS. Legislative Authority ..5. Recommendations ..8. Appendix A - Service Needs and Resources Subcommittee Report ..15. Appendix B - Best Practices Subcommittee Report ..18. Appendix C - Town Hall Meetings ..21. Appendix D - Health Care Professionals by County ..34. Appendix E - Programs and Services by County ..46. Appendix F - A Caregiver's Point of Appendix G - Ideas to Help Patients and Their Caregivers ..50. Appendix H - Glossary ..54. References ..56. Note: Appendix H contains a Glossary of terms. The first time one of these terms is used in the Report , it appears in italics. March, 2004. wisdom faith hope 1. BACKGROUND. CHRONIC PAIN Yet chronic pain is poorly managed, receives lit- Unfortunately, most Americans today continue to tle attention in healthcare educational programs, die in hospitals or other health facilities, often Chronic pain is among the most disabling and and is one of the most under funded major receiving invasive, high-technology treatments costly afflictions in North America.

23 percent of American households are involved in caregiving to persons who are 50 years of age and older. Between 1987 and 1997, the number of households in the United States caring for

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of Report of the Ohio Compassionate Care Task Force

1 Report of the Ohio Compassionate Care Task Force CONTENTS. Legislative Authority ..5. Recommendations ..8. Appendix A - Service Needs and Resources Subcommittee Report ..15. Appendix B - Best Practices Subcommittee Report ..18. Appendix C - Town Hall Meetings ..21. Appendix D - Health Care Professionals by County ..34. Appendix E - Programs and Services by County ..46. Appendix F - A Caregiver's Point of Appendix G - Ideas to Help Patients and Their Caregivers ..50. Appendix H - Glossary ..54. References ..56. Note: Appendix H contains a Glossary of terms. The first time one of these terms is used in the Report , it appears in italics. March, 2004. wisdom faith hope 1. BACKGROUND. CHRONIC PAIN Yet chronic pain is poorly managed, receives lit- Unfortunately, most Americans today continue to tle attention in healthcare educational programs, die in hospitals or other health facilities, often Chronic pain is among the most disabling and and is one of the most under funded major receiving invasive, high-technology treatments costly afflictions in North America.

2 A meta- health problems in the United States. that would be more appropriate for those expect- analysis of studies looking a chronic pain in the ed to recover from their medical conditions. The general population identified the prevalence of TERMINAL ILLNESS Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences severe chronic pain to be 8% in children and for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment demonstrat- 11% in adults (Harstall & Ospina, 2003). In some respects, this century's scientific and ed substantial shortcomings in the care of seri- Chronic pain has significant socioeconomic, medical advances have made living easier and ously ill hospitalized adults (SUPPORT, 1995). health, and quality of life implications. Persons dying harder (Field & Cassel, 1997, ). The This study revealed that patient preferences are afflicted with chronic pain often cannot work, focus on cure too often diverts attention from the often not known or honored, patients and family participate in physical activity, or enjoy their care that persons want and need (Field & Cassel, members are not accurately informed of the family life or social activities.)

3 The physical and 1997). The need for expanding and responding prognosis, pain at the end of life is often under- psychological consequences of inadequately to end-of-life care is growing rapidly. As the treated, and death too often occurs in intensive managed chronic pain include decreased organ demographics of the aging population shift we care unit settings. system function, impaired immune function, find individuals are living longer with chronic, sleeplessness, loss of appetite, and impaired debilitating, and life-threatening illnesses and the Certified hospice programs have been delivering movement. Soon the person becomes the victim rate of deaths are beginning to increase. We live comprehensive, cost-effective interdisciplinary of a vicious cycle in which total preoccupation in a death-denying culture that fails to promote care to the terminally ill in this country for over with pain leads to irritability and depression, effective planning for the end of life.

4 Death is 20 years. Family members of persons who died putting the individual at increased risk for sui- perceived as a failure in the medical and lay at home with hospice services are more likely to cide (Fishbain, 1999). communities. Schools of medicine and nursing Report a favorable dying experience that those have little coursework in the physical and psy- whose loved one died in an institution (Teno, et Chronic pain is also expensive. The cost of lost chological needs of the dying patient. Yet, it is al., 2004). However, many patients and families productivity due to pain is estimated at $ inevitable that we will all die; every healthcare who would benefit from receiving hospice care billion annually (Stewart, et al., 2003). When professional will encounter death and dying in do not receive these services. Some reasons medical costs are added in, the annual cost of practice.

5 Include a reluctance of healthcare providers to pain is upwards of $120 billion (Griffin, 2003). discuss advance care planning, difficulties in 2. wisdom determining a 6-month or less prognosis, and increased longevity has placed unforeseen finan- faith inadequate payment for high-cost palliative inter- ventions that are effective but cannot be paid for under hospice reimbursement systems. cial and emotional pressures on families. New medications and treatments allow people to leave the traditional hospital setting and return hope home sooner. It also thrusts family caregivers Palliative care is a term used to describe compre- into new roles. Today, many caregivers must hensive, interdisciplinary care to persons with oversee the in-home use of sophisticated life-threatening illnesses and their family mem- machines such as feeding tubes and respirators bers.

6 It is similar to hospice care except it offers that were once the responsibility of only highly care to a broader population of patients. There is trained health care professionals. Often care- no 6-month or less prognosis criterion for givers must administer multiple medications and receiving palliative care services. Ideally, pallia- measure daily weights, blood pressures and tive care is initiated at the time of diagnosis with blood tests, reporting data to professionals so a life-threatening illness. Palliative care is both a that medication dosages can be adjusted accord- general approach to comprehensive comfort-ori- ingly. The caregivers who provide these services ented care that is integrated with disease modify- frequently must also provide transportation of ing therapies as well as a growing practice spe- their loved one to and from appointments, in cialty for highly trained physicians, nurses, phar- addition to providing nutrition, bathing and linen macists, social workers, chaplains, and other changes.

7 The caregivers must become the members of the interdisciplinary team. Palliative patient's advocate, navigating a complicated care has been demonstrated to significantly health care system on behalf of their loved one. reduce the costs of care in the final days of life Appendix F, written by a public representative to (Naik, 2004). the Task Force , illustrates some of the emotional pressures family members face. IMPACT OF CHRONIC PAIN AND TERMINAL. ILLNESS ON FAMILY CAREGIVERS Studies conducted by the National Alliance for Caregiving and the American Association for The medical progress that has brought us Retired Persons found that individuals in nearly 3. 23 percent of American households are involved tain a job and have financial constraints as well. in caregiving to persons who are 50 years of age Caregivers often give up their own employment, and older.

8 Between 1987 and 1997, the number losing personal health care benefits and payment of households in the United States caring for into pension plans or into Social Security. family members or friends over age 50 tripled to Advocacy for family caregivers will require a col- over 22 million. More than 7 million older lective public voice, legislative initiatives and adults now have long-term care needs. This Medicare reform. Information regarding this number will reach 10 million by 2020 and 14 emerging social and public policy issue can be million by 2040. (National Alliance for obtained from advocacy groups such as the Caregiving/AARP, 1997) National Family Caregiver Support Program, a project of the National Association of Area Family caregivers are usually unpaid. They pro- Agencies on Aging. vide a vital service to the American economy, as the value of their services would exceed $200.

9 Billion per year. They currently provide approxi- mately 80 percent of all home care services in the country. Family caregiving may delay or avoid the need for institutionalization of their loved one (Arno, Levine & Memmott, 1999). Family caregivers are often referred to as the hidden patient. While caregiving can be rewarding, it is also extremely time-consuming, costly and stressful. Caregivers often put the needs of the patient ahead of their own needs. They may suffer from social isolation, sleep deprivation, and anxiety. Generally these care- givers are women. They may be elderly them- selves or may be daughters or daughters-in-law who are dealing with other responsibilities such as raising their own children, attempting to main- 4. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY wisdom Recognizing the importance of addressing the MEMBERSHIP faith profound physical, psychosocial, and economic impacts of terminal illness and severe chronic pain, the Ohio General Assembly enacted House Chairperson: Virginia Haller, MD.

10 Hope Medical Consultant Bill 474 December 2002, creating the Division of Family and Community Health Ohio Department of Health Compassionate Care Task Force . The Task Force met monthly from May 2003 through March General Assembly: 2004 for the purpose of studying and making Senator Kevin Coughlin Represented by Sonia Kap or Charlie Solley recommendations concerning issues surrounding 27th District the treatment and care of persons with terminal Cuyahoga Falls illness or severe chronic pain. These recommen- Senator Jim Jordan dations are discussed in this Report . The Task Represented by Wendy Johnson, Maria Verdine, or Maria Cordonnier Force will continue to meet through March 2005 12th District Urbana to address its second responsibility of monitoring and reporting on the implementation of its rec- Representative Merle Kearns When unable to attend, represented by Julie Di Rossi ommendations.


Related search queries