Remand
Found 9 free book(s)
12 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT 13 ...
www.votersunite.orgRemanded; Remand Cannot be Waived, nor Federal Jurisdiction Created by Stipulation of Parties. The right to secure a remand of the action to state court when there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction basis for removing the action to a federal court cannot be waived by either party. Albingia Versicherungs A.G. v. Schenker Int'l
VA Form 4597, YOUR RIGHTS TO APPEAL OUR DECISION
www.va.govthe decision. The Board may also choose to remand an issue or issues to the local VA office for additional development. If the Board did this in your case, then a "Remand" section follows the "Order." However, you cannot appeal an issue remanded to the local VA office because a remand is not a final decision.
Removal A Guide to Remand - Federal Bar Association
www.fedbar.orgThe removal/remand statutory scheme pres-ents a deceptively, complex maze with many hidden dangers. This article gives practitio-ners a “map” that shows the correct and safe route through that maze. RemovalA Guide to Remand By George Lieberman
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govThe panel’s actions on remand clearly defy this Court’s judgment for the reasons ably explained by Judge Hig-ginson. This Court could, and should, have granted a writ of mandamus ordering the panel below to withdraw certifi-cation and remand to the District Court. Mandamus relief is an “extraordinary remedy” appropriate for the “excep-
MOTIONS TO REOPEN OR RECONSIDER IMMIGRATION …
cdn.ca9.uscourts.govFurthermore, “[a]liens who seek to remand or reopen proceedings to pursue relief bear a ‘heavy burden’ of proving that, if proceedings were reopened, the new evidence would likely change the result in the case.” Shin v. Mukasey, 547 F.3d 1019, 1025 (9th Cir. 2008). …
MOTIONS TO REOPEN OR RECONSIDER IMMIGRATION …
cdn.ca9.uscourts.govFurthermore, “[a]liens who seek to remand or reopen proceedings to pursue relief bear a ‘heavy burden’ of proving that, if proceedings were reopened, the new evidence would likely change the result in the case.” Shin v. Mukasey, 547 F.3d 1019, 1025 (9th Cir. 2008). “[A] prima facie case for relief is sufficient to justify
Matter of A-R-C-G- et al., Respondents
www.justice.govAug 26, 2014 · We will remand the record for further proceedings. II. ANALYSIS A. Particular Social Group The question whether a group is a “particular social group” within the meaning of the Act is a question of law that we review de novo. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(ii) (2014); see Malonga v. Mukasey, 546 F.3d 546, 553 (8th
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govand remand for the Court of Ap peals to reassess the District Court’s price impact determination. On the second ques-tion, we agree with the Second Circuit that our precedents require defendants to bear the burden of persuasion to prove a lack of price impact by a preponderance of the evi-dence. We emphasize, though, that the burden of persua-
United States Department of Education Office for Civil Rights
www2.ed.govPage 3 of 12 – U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights Discrimination Complaint Form, Consent Form, and Complaint Processing Procedures