Example: marketing

00 NAVY ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION (NEC)

-23 / Febajay i%8 (.0 RESEARCH MEMORANDUM00CO navy ENLISTEDCLASSIFICATION (NEC)I0 REPORTING TO THEENLISTED MASTER RECORD(EMR) FILEAlan MarcusMarianne BowesPatricia ByrnesDTICM, 2 LECTE~DCT CT 2 5 1988A l)i'ision 1 f Hudson InstititeCENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES, 101 Ford A enu " I';? ()ffric Pox 16268 , Virginia 22302-0268IP !,0 Ibi,88 00,08Of8vcdI b' --u,?i.:;r. 'c or i,,Lc~ rio >se;:i iut2ir unhrito~dWort ronducted under contract N,00014-87-0-0001,This Ronnsnrh Memorandum reprsents the boat opinion of CNA at the time of Issue.!I does not necosrairily reprrsont the opinion of the Departmont of the CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEIa. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION I b.

Eu CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES A O, nsion of Hudson Institute 4401 Ford Avenue -Post Office Box 16268 -Alexandria, Virginia 22302-0268 -(703) 824-2000 12 February 1988 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION LIST Subj: Center for Naval Analyses Research Memorandum 88-23 Encl: CNA Research Memorandum 88-23, Navy Enlisted Classification

Tags:

  Navy, Enlisted, Classification, Navy enlisted classifications, Navy enlisted

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of 00 NAVY ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION (NEC)

1 -23 / Febajay i%8 (.0 RESEARCH MEMORANDUM00CO navy ENLISTEDCLASSIFICATION (NEC)I0 REPORTING TO THEENLISTED MASTER RECORD(EMR) FILEAlan MarcusMarianne BowesPatricia ByrnesDTICM, 2 LECTE~DCT CT 2 5 1988A l)i'ision 1 f Hudson InstititeCENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES, 101 Ford A enu " I';? ()ffric Pox 16268 , Virginia 22302-0268IP !,0 Ibi,88 00,08Of8vcdI b' --u,?i.:;r. 'c or i,,Lc~ rio >se;:i iut2ir unhrito~dWort ronducted under contract N,00014-87-0-0001,This Ronnsnrh Memorandum reprsents the boat opinion of CNA at the time of Issue.!I does not necosrairily reprrsont the opinion of the Departmont of the CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEIa. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION I b.

2 RESTRICTIVE MARKINGSUNCLASSIFIED2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION I AVAILABILITY OF REPORT2b. DECLASSIFICATION/DOWNCRADING SCHEDULE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) S. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S)CRM 88-236a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 5b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION(If applicable)Center for Naval Analyses CNA Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OP-81)6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code)4401 Ford Avenue navy DepartmentAlexandria, Virginia 22302-0268 Washington, 20350-20008a. NAME OF FUNDING / ORGANIZATION 8b. OFFICE SYMBOL 9.

3 PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(If applicable)Office of Naval Research ONR N00014-87-C-00018c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERSPROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNIT800 North Quincy Street ELEMENT NO. NO. NO. ACCESSION , Virginia 22217 65154N R014811. TITLE (Include Security CLASSIFICATION ) navy ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION (NEC) Reporting to the ENLISTED Master Record (EMR) File12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)Alan Marcus. Marianne Bowes, Patricia Bvrnes1 3a. TYPE OF REPORT 13b. TIME COVERED 4. DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) S. PAGE COUNTF inal FROM TO February 1988 506. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION17 COSATI CODES 18. SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)FIELD GROUP SUB-GROUP CLASSIFICATION , EMR ( ENLISTED Master Record), ENLISTED personnel, Files05 02 (records), Naval personnel, NEC ( navy ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION ),05 09 Occupations, Reporting; Statistical data, Tables (data), Time series, a, analysis, Timeliness19.

4 ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)-The research memorandum summarizes an analysis carried out at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) todetermine the timeliness of the navy ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION (NEC) reports to the ENLISTED Master Record (EMR). Usingquarterly EMR files from June 1983 to June 1984 ind from June 1986 to June 1987, analysts estimated the NECreporting lags ( , times between the date the NEC is awarded and the date the NEC is posted to an individual's EMRrecord). The results indicate that NEC reporting lags are relatively rare. Over 90 percent of the NECs appeared on thequarterly EMR within four months of their being awarded.

5 Looking ahead only one quarter, therefore, seems to besufficient for achieving a relatively complete count, whether one is estimating the number of new awards or determiningthe total DISTRIBUTION j AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21 ASTOACT SECUJRITY CLASS;FiCATIOaiI ilk-rl A- Z,AMZ AS RPT fI rC USERS Unclassified22a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL 22b. TELEPHONE (Include Area Code) 2c OFFICE SYMBOLDO FORM 1473,84 MAR 83 APR edition may be used until exhaustedAll other editions are -osciete SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS DAGE'L AC- V V' .- ,,y "I ,-z- aEu CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSESA O, nsion of Hudson Institute 4401 Ford Avenue -Post Office Box 16268 -Alexandria, Virginia 22302-0268 -(703) 824-200012 February 1988 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION LISTSubj: Center for Naval Analyses Research Memorandum 88-23 Encl: CNA Research Memorandum 88-23, navy ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION (NEC) Reporting to the ENLISTED Master Record (EMR) File, byAlan Marcus, Marianne Bowes, and Patricia Byrnes, Feb 19881.

6 Enclosure (1) is forwarded as a matter of possible This Research Memorandum examines the reporting of NECs to theEMR. The award date of the NEC was compared to the appearance of theNEC on the EMR. The analysis found that significant reporting lags wererare.'tf1 ROBERT F. LOCY1 MAND irectorNavy Manpower ProgramDistribution List: 4,1".cReverse pageF--rI IeA-1-% , ." , .+Subj: Center for Naval Analyses Research Memorandum 88-23 Distribution List:SNDLFKQ6D NAVPERSRANDCENFJA I COMNAVMILPERSAttn: NMPC 40 FJA9 EPMACAttn: Code 51 Fri C2 NErP175 CNTECHTRAOPNAVOP-913 COP-i 12OP- I 12 FOP-132OP-135 EOP-393OP-592% J0%CRM 88-23/ February 1988 navy ENLISTEDCLASSIFICATION (NEC)REPORTING TO THE ENLISTEDMASTER RECORD (EMR) FILEAlan MarcusMarianne BowesPatricia ByrnesNavy-Marine Corps Planning and Manpower DivisionA Division of Hudson Institute" "CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES4401 Ford Avenue * Post Office Box 16268 Alexandria Vcrrtma research memorandum summar-izes an analysis carried out at theCenter for Naval Analyses (CNA) todetermine tht timeliness of the NavyEnlisted CLASSIFICATION (NEC) reports tothe ENLISTED Master Record (EMR).

7 Usingquarterly EMR files from June 1983 toJune 1984 and from June 1986 toJune 1987, analysts estimated the NECreporting lags ( , times between thedate the NEC is awarded and the date theNEC is posted to an individual's EMRrecord). The results indicate that NECreporting lags are relatively 90 percent of the NECs appeared onthe quarterly EMR within four months oftheir being awarded. Looking ahead onlyone quarter, therefore, seems to besufficient for achieving a relativelycomplete count, whether one is estima-ting the number of new awards or deter-mining the total OF CONTENTSPageIntroduction .. 1 NEC Reporting: A Cross-Section Look .. 2 Time-Series Estimation of Reporting Lags.

8 7 Conclusion .. 13 Appendix A: Listing of NECs With Award Dates ofPrevious NECs .. A-1 A-17'Appendix B: Supporting Data Tables .. B-1 -,B-9i! .-iii-,_ r . , .., , .., >..: .? ?.. *..i, >,,LIST OF TA&LES1 Distribution of New NECs by Months of Reporting Lag:D86 to M87 .. 32 Distribution of New NECs With Post-M87 Award Dates, byNEC Group .. 43 Distribution of New NECs by Months of Reporting Lag:D83 to M84 .. 54 Distribution of New NECs With Same Award Date as an Old NEC,by NEC Group .. 65 Distribution of New NECs With Same Award Date as an Old NEC,by Months of Report Lag: M87 .. 86 Number of NECs by Award Date and Date of First EMRO bservation: J86 to J87 .. 107 Number of NECs by Award Date and Date of First EMIRO bservation: J83 to J84.

9 108 Likelihood of EMR Appearance by Time Since Award:J86 to J87 .. 119 Likelihood of EMR Appearance by Time Since Award:J83 to J 84 .. 1210 Number of NECs Added by Looking at Future EMRs .. 14o-Vi9~4|-V0-b -, -., ".. , ' '."". ,.. ,- - .",' ,, " ," .= Z P .,7 .' ." . '" ," ., " ,INTRODUCTIONNavy ENLISTED CLASSIFICATION (NEC) codes identify an individual'sparticular skills in more detail than the navy occupational or ratingstructure. To navy detailers, trainers, and analysts, NECs reported tothe ENLISTED Master Record (EMR) files are an important source of infor-mation on valid earned qualifications and skills of ENLISTED at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) use NEC data on the CNA-held quarterly EMR files to examine both the amount and usage of skillsheld by personnel.

10 Accurate and timely reporting of NECs to the EMR isimportant to CNA analysis as well as to manpower managers involved inday-to-day personnel paper summarizes an analysis done at CNA on the timeliness ofNEC reports to the EMR. The primary focus is on whether or not there isa lag in the reporting of new NECs to the EMR. A previous studyI foundthat, for new NECs on the September 1985 (S85) EMR file, only 80 percenthad FY 1985 award dates (9 percent had FY 1984 award dates, and 11percent had FY 1983 or earlier dates). In that analysis, a new NEC wasdefined as an NEC that appeared on the S85 EMR but was not on the S84 EMR. In this memorandum, new NECs are defined as NECs that did notappear on the previous quarterly should be noted that the analysis summarized here deals onlywith NECs that are, at some point, recorded in the EMR.


Related search queries