Example: bachelor of science

AP English Language and Composition

AP English Language . Scoring Rubrics Free-Response Question 1: Synthesis Essay Free-Response Question 2: Rhetorical Analysis Free-Response Question 3: Argument Essay Effective Fall 2019. 2019 College Board. College Board, Advanced Placement, AP, AP Central, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of College Board. All other products and services may be trademarks of their respective owners. Visit College Board on the web: Scoring Rubric for Question 1: Synthesis Essay 6 points Reporting Scoring Criteria Category Row A 0 points 1 point Thesis For any of the following: Responds to the prompt with a thesis that presents a defensible position. (0-1 points) There is no defensible thesis. The intended thesis only restates the prompt. The intended thesis provides a summary of the issue with no apparent or coherent claim. There is a thesis, but it does not respond to the prompt. Decision Rules and Scoring Notes Responses that do not earn this point: Responses that earn this point: Only restate the prompt.

rhetorical choice in the passage contributes to the writer’s argument, purpose, or message. 4 points. EVIDENCE: Provides specific evidence to support all claims in a line of reasoning. AND. ... Explain how the writer’s use of rhetorical choices contributes to the student’s

Tags:

  Writer, Choice, Compositions, Writer s

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of AP English Language and Composition

1 AP English Language . Scoring Rubrics Free-Response Question 1: Synthesis Essay Free-Response Question 2: Rhetorical Analysis Free-Response Question 3: Argument Essay Effective Fall 2019. 2019 College Board. College Board, Advanced Placement, AP, AP Central, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of College Board. All other products and services may be trademarks of their respective owners. Visit College Board on the web: Scoring Rubric for Question 1: Synthesis Essay 6 points Reporting Scoring Criteria Category Row A 0 points 1 point Thesis For any of the following: Responds to the prompt with a thesis that presents a defensible position. (0-1 points) There is no defensible thesis. The intended thesis only restates the prompt. The intended thesis provides a summary of the issue with no apparent or coherent claim. There is a thesis, but it does not respond to the prompt. Decision Rules and Scoring Notes Responses that do not earn this point: Responses that earn this point: Only restate the prompt.

2 Responds to the prompt rather than restate or rephrase the prompt, and the Do not take a position, or the position is vague or must thesis clearly takes a position rather than just stating that there are pros/cons. be inferred. Equivocate or summarize other's arguments but not the student's ( , some people say it's good, some people say it's bad). State an obvious fact rather than making a claim that requires a defense. Additional Notes: The thesis may be more than one sentence, provided the sentences are in close proximity. The thesis may be anywhere within the response. For a thesis to be defensible, the sources must include at least minimal evidence that could be used to support that thesis; however, the student need not cite that evidence to earn the thesis point. The thesis may establish a line of reasoning that structures the essay, but it needn't do so to earn the thesis point. A thesis that meets the criteria can be awarded the point whether or not the rest of the response successfully supports that line of reasoning.

3 AP English Language Scoring Rubric, Free-Response Question 1-3 | SG 1. Reporting Scoring Criteria Category Row B 0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points Evidence Simply restates thesis EVIDENCE: EVIDENCE: EVIDENCE: EVIDENCE: AND (if present), repeats Provides evidence from or Provides evidence from or Provides specific evidence Provides specific Commentary provided information, or references at least two of the references at least three of from at least three of evidence from at least (0-4 points) references fewer than two provided sources. the provided sources. the provided sources to three of the provided of the provided sources. AND AND support all claims in a line of sources to support reasoning. all claims in a line of COMMENTARY: COMMENTARY: AND reasoning. Summarizes the evidence Explains how some of the but does not explain how evidence relates to the COMMENTARY: AND. the evidence supports the student's argument, but Explains how some of the COMMENTARY: student's argument.

4 No line of reasoning is evidence supports a line of Consistently explains how established, or the line of reasoning. the evidence supports a reasoning is faulty. line of reasoning. Decision Rules and Scoring Notes Typical responses that Typical responses that earn Typical responses that earn Typical responses that earn Typical responses that earn 0 points: 1 point: 2 points: 3 points: earn 4 points: Are incoherent or do not Tend to focus on summary Consist of a mix of Uniformly offer evidence Uniformly offer address the prompt. or description of sources specific evidence and to support claims. evidence to support May be just opinion with rather than specific broad generalities. Focus on the importance claims. no textual references details. May contain some of specific words and Focus on the or references that are simplistic, inaccurate, or details from the sources importance of specific irrelevant. repetitive explanations to build an argument. words and details from that don't strengthen the Organize an argument the sources to build an argument.

5 As a line of reasoning argument. May make one point well composed of multiple Organize and support but either do not make supporting claims. an argument as a line of multiple supporting claims Commentary may fail to reasoning composed or do not adequately integrate some evidence of multiple supporting support more than one or fail to support a key claims, each with claim. claim. adequate evidence that Do not explain the is clearly explained. connections or progression between the student's claims, so a line of reasoning is not clearly established. Additional Notes: Writing that suffers from grammatical and/or mechanical errors that interfere with communication cannot earn the fourth point in this row. AP English Language Scoring Rubric, Free-Response Question 1-3 | SG 2. Reporting Scoring Criteria Category Row C 0 points 1 point Sophistication Does not meet the criteria for one point. Demonstrates sophistication of thought and/or a complex understanding of the (0-1 points) rhetorical situation.

6 Decision Rules and Scoring Notes Responses that do not earn this point: Responses that earn this point may demonstrate sophistication of thought Attempt to contextualize their argument, but such attempts and/or a complex understanding of the rhetorical situation by doing any of the consist predominantly of sweeping generalizations. following: Only hint at or suggest other arguments. 1. Crafting a nuanced argument by consistently identifying and exploring complexities or tensions across the sources. Use complicated or complex sentences or Language that is ineffective because it does not enhance the student's 2. Articulating the implications or limitations of an argument (either the argument. student's argument or arguments conveyed in the sources) by situating it within a broader context. 3. Making effective rhetorical choices that consistently strengthen the force and impact of the student's argument. 4. Employing a style that is consistently vivid and persuasive. Additional Notes: This point should be awarded only if the sophistication of thought or complex understanding is part of the student's argument, not merely a phrase or reference.

7 AP English Language Scoring Rubric, Free-Response Question 1-3 | SG 3. Scoring Rubric for Question 2: Rhetorical Analysis 6 points Reporting Scoring Criteria Category Row A 0 points 1 point Thesis For any of the following: Responds to the prompt with a defensible thesis that analyzes the writer 's (0-1 points) There is no defensible thesis. rhetorical choices. The intended thesis only restates the prompt. The intended thesis provides a summary of the issue with no apparent or coherent claim. There is a thesis, but it does not respond to the prompt. Decision Rules and Scoring Notes Responses that do not earn this point: Responses that earn this point: Only restate the prompt. Responds to the prompt rather than restate or rephrase the prompt, and Fail to address the rhetorical choices the writer of the passage makes. the thesis clearly takes a position rather than just stating that there are pros/cons. Describe or repeat the passage rather than making a claim that requires a defense.

8 Additional Notes: The thesis may be more than one sentence, provided the sentences are in close proximity. The thesis may be anywhere within the response. For a thesis to be defensible, the passage must include at least minimal evidence that could be used to support that thesis; however, the student need not cite that evidence to earn the thesis point. The thesis may establish a line of reasoning that structures the essay, but it needn't do so to earn the thesis point. A thesis that meets the criteria can be awarded the point whether or not the rest of the response successfully supports that line of reasoning. AP English Language Scoring Rubric, Free-Response Question 1-3 | SG 4. Reporting Scoring Criteria Category Row B 0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points Evidence Simply restates thesis EVIDENCE: EVIDENCE: EVIDENCE: EVIDENCE: AND (if present), repeats Provides evidence Provides some specific, relevant Provides specific evidence to Provides specific evidence to Commentary provided information, that is mostly evidence.

9 Support all claims in a line of support all claims in a line of (0-4 points) or offers information general. AND reasoning. reasoning. irrelevant to the AND AND AND. COMMENTARY: prompt. COMMENTARY: Explains how some of the COMMENTARY: COMMENTARY: Summarizes the evidence relates to the student's Explains how some of the Consistently explains how the evidence but does argument, but no line of evidence supports a line of evidence supports a line of not explain how the reasoning is established, or the reasoning. reasoning. evidence supports line of reasoning is faulty. AND AND. the student's Explains how at least one Explains how multiple rhetorical argument. rhetorical choice in the passage choices in the passage contributes to the writer 's contribute to the writer 's argument, purpose, or message. argument, purpose, or message. Decision Rules and Scoring Notes Typical responses Typical responses Typical responses that earn Typical responses that earn 3 Typical responses that earn that earn 0 points: that earn 1 point: 2 points: points: 4 points: Are incoherent or Tend to focus Consist of a mix of specific Uniformly offer evidence to Uniformly offer evidence to do not address the on summary evidence and broad support claims.

10 Support claims. prompt. or description generalities. Focus on the importance of Focus on the importance of May be just opinion of a passage May contain some simplistic, specific words and details specific words and details with no textual rather than inaccurate, or repetitive from the passage to build an from the passage to build an references or specific details or explanations that don't argument. argument. references that are techniques. strengthen the argument. Organize an argument as a Organize and support irrelevant. Mention May make one point well but line of reasoning composed an argument as a line of rhetorical either do not make multiple of multiple supporting reasoning composed of choices with little supporting claims or do not claims. multiple supporting claims, or no explanation. adequately support more than each with adequate evidence Commentary may fail to one claim. integrate some evidence or that is clearly explained. Do not explain the fail to support a key claim.


Related search queries