Example: confidence

CASES AND NOTES SUMMARY FOR CONTRACT LAW - …

university of Alberta, 2015 LAW 410 (Prof. Shannon O Byrne) CASES AND NOTES SUMMARY FOR CONTRACT LAW P a g e | 1 P a g e | 2 Table of Contents DEFINITIONS AND TERMS .. 7 FORMATION OF THE AGREEMENT: OFFER + ACCEPTANCE .. 7 OFFER AND INVITATION TO TREAT .. 7 Canadian Dyers Assocatian Ltd. v Burton .. 7 Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd.. 8 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.. 9 Goldthorpe v Logan .. 10 R v Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd.. 11 Enterprises Ltd. V Defence Construction (1951) Ltd.. 12 COMMUNICATION OF OFFER .. 12 ACCEPTANCE .. 13 Livingstone v Evans .. 13 Battle of the 13 Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-Cell-O Corp.

University of Alberta, 2015 LAW 410 (Prof. Shannon O’Byrne) ASES AND NOTES SUMMARY FOR ONTRA T LAW

Tags:

  Notes, University, Summary, And notes summary for

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of CASES AND NOTES SUMMARY FOR CONTRACT LAW - …

1 university of Alberta, 2015 LAW 410 (Prof. Shannon O Byrne) CASES AND NOTES SUMMARY FOR CONTRACT LAW P a g e | 1 P a g e | 2 Table of Contents DEFINITIONS AND TERMS .. 7 FORMATION OF THE AGREEMENT: OFFER + ACCEPTANCE .. 7 OFFER AND INVITATION TO TREAT .. 7 Canadian Dyers Assocatian Ltd. v Burton .. 7 Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd.. 8 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.. 9 Goldthorpe v Logan .. 10 R v Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd.. 11 Enterprises Ltd. V Defence Construction (1951) Ltd.. 12 COMMUNICATION OF OFFER .. 12 ACCEPTANCE .. 13 Livingstone v Evans .. 13 Battle of the 13 Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-Cell-O Corp.

2 14 Tywood Industries Ltd v St Anne-Nackwaic Pulp & Paper Co Ltd .. 14 ProCD v Matthew Zeidenberg and Silken Mountain Web Services, Inc .. 15 Dawson v Helicopter Exploration Co .. 16 Felthouse v Bindley .. 17 Saint John Tug Boats Co v Irving Refinery Ltd .. 18 Eliason v Henshaw .. 19 COMMUNICATION OF ACCEPTANCE .. 20 Household Fire & Carriage Accident Insurance Co v Grant .. 20 Holwell Securities v Hughes .. 21 Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl Und Stahlwarenhatulelsgesellschaft mbH .. 22 Rudder v Microsoft Corp .. 23 TERMINATION OF OFFER .. 24 Dickinson v Dodds .. 24 Byrne v Van Tienhoven .. 25 Errington v Errington And Woods .. 25 Barrick v Clark .. 26 FORMATION OF THE AGREEMENT: CERTIANTY OF TERMS.

3 27 VAGUENESS .. 27 R v CAE Industries 28 P a g e | 3 INCOMPLETE TERMS .. 28 May & Butcher Ltd. v. R.. 29 Hillas & Co. v. Arcos Ltd.. 29 Foley v. Classique Coaches Ltd.. 31 AGREEMENTS TO NEGOTIATE .. 31 Empress Towners Ltd. v. Bank of Nova Scotia .. 31 Manpar Enterprises Ltd. v. Canada .. 33 Wellington City Council v Body Corporate 51702 (Wellington) .. 34 Bhasin v. Hrynew .. 35 ANTICIPATION OF FORMALIZATION .. 37 Bawitko Investments Ltd. v. Kernels Popcorn Ltd.. 37 THE ENFORCEMENT OF PROMISES .. 38 EXCHANGE AND BARGAINS .. 39 The Governors of Dalhousie College at Halifax v. The Estate of Arthur Boutilier, Deceased .. 39 Brantford General Hospital Foundation v Marquis Estate.

4 40 Wood v Lucy Duff-Gordon .. 41 PAST CONSIDERATION .. 41 Eastwood v Kenyon .. 41 Lampleigh v Brathwait .. 42 CONSIDERATION MUST BE IN THE EYES OF THE LAW .. 42 Thomas v Thomas .. 42 FORBEARANCE TO SUE .. 43 BONA FIDE COMPROMISES OF DISPUTE CLAIMS .. 43 B.( ) v. Arkin .. 43 PRE-EXISTING LEGAL DUTY .. 44 Stilk v Myrick .. 44 Gilbert Steel Ltd. v. university Const. Ltd.. 45 Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd.. 46 Greater Fredericton Airport Authority Inc. v NAV Canada .. 47 PROMISES TO ACCEPT LESS .. 47 Foakes v Beer .. 48 Robichaud v Caisse .. 48 Re Selectmove Ltd.. 49 P a g e | 4 Foot v Rawlings .. 49 THE LEGISLATIVE RESPONSE TO FOAKES V 50 Judicature Act.

5 50 PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL AND WAIVER .. 51 Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Company .. 51 Central London Property Trust Ltd. V. High Trees House Ltd.. 52 John Burrows Ltd. V. Subsurface Surveys Ltd.. 53 D. & C. Builders Ltd. v. Rees .. 54 Saskatchewan River Bungalows Ltd. v. Maritime Life Assurance Co.. 54 International Knitwear Architects Inc. v. Kabob Investments Ltd.. 55 Alan & Co. v. El Nasr Export & Import 56 The Post Chaser .. 57 SWORD OR SHIELD? .. 58 Combe v Combe .. 58 Petridis v Shabinsky .. 59 Robichaud v Caisse .. 59 INTENTIONS TO CREATE LEGAL RELATIONS .. 60 Balfour v Balfour .. 60 FORMALITY: PROMISES UNDER SEAL .. 61 Royal Bank v Kiska .. 61 FORMALITY: THE REQUIREMENT OF WRITING.

6 62 PART PERFORMANCE .. 63 Deglman v Guaranty Trust Co.. 63 Thompson v Guaranty Trust Co.. 64 Lensen v Lensen .. 65 PRIVITY OF CONTRACT .. 65 Provender v Wood .. 65 Tweddle v Atkinson .. 66 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd.. 66 WAYS IN WHICH A THIRD PARTY MAY ACQUIRE THE BENEFIT .. 67 Beswick v Beswick .. 68 Beswick v Beswick .. 68 P a g e | 5 New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v Satterthwaite & Co Ltd .. 69 London Drugs Ltd v Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd .. 70 Edgeworth Construction Ltd. v. Lea & Associates Ltd.. 70 Fraser River Pile & Dredge Ltd. v Can-Dive Services Ltd.. 71 CONTINGENT AGREEMENTS .. 72 Wiebe v Bobsien .. 72 RECIPROCAL SUBSIDIARY OBLIGATIONS.

7 73 Dynamic Transport v OK Detailing .. 73 REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF SUBSIDIARY OBLIGATIONS .. 74 Eastwalsh Homes Ltd. v. Anatal Developments Ltd.. 74 UNILATERAL WAIVER .. 75 Turney v Zhilka .. 75 REPRSENTATION AND TERMS .. 76 Misrepresentation and Rescission .. 76 Redgrave v Hurd .. 77 REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCOVER THE TRUTH .. 78 Smith v Land and House Property Corp .. 78 Bank of BC v Wren Developments Ltd.. 79 Universal Concerts Canada v Ryckman Amateur Sports Society .. 79 INDEMNIFICATION .. 80 Kupchak v Dayson Holdings Ltd .. 80 Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton .. 81 Dick Bentley Productions Ltd. v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd.. 82 Leaf v International Galleries .. 82 STATUTORY REFORM.

8 83 Sale of Goods Act .. 84 Fair Trading Act .. 84 CONCURRENT LIABILITY IN CONTRACT AND TORT .. 86 Sodd Corp v N. Tessis .. 86 BG Checo International Ltd v British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority .. 86 CLASSIFICATION OF TERMS .. 88 Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd .. 88 P a g e | 6 Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd. v. L. Schuler .. 88 FRUSTRATION .. 89 First City Trust Co. v. Triple Five Corp.. 89 PAROLE EVIDENCE RULE .. 90 STANDARD FORM CONTRACTS AND EXCLUSION CLAUSES .. 90 IMPLIED TERMS .. 90 Machtinger v Hoj 90 Gateway Realty Ltd. v. Arton Holdings Ltd.. 91 Bhasin v Hrynew .. 91 INCORPORATION .. 93 Thorton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd.. 93 Tilden Rent-A-Car Co.

9 V Clendenning .. 94 Karroll v Silver Star Mountain Resorts Ltd.. 95 FUNDAMENTAL BREACH .. 96 Karsales (Harrow) Ltd v Wallis .. 96 Tercon Contractors Ltd. v British Columbia (Transportation and Highways) .. 97 P a g e | 7 DEFINITIONS AND TERMS BILATERAL CONTRACT : a CONTRACT in which the contracting parties are bound to fulfil obligations reciprocally towards the formed by the exchange of promises in which the promise of one party is consideration supporting the promise of the other as contrasted with a unilateral CONTRACT which is formed by the exchange of a promise for an act. UNILATERAL CONTRACT : One party makes an express engagement or undertakes a performance, without receiving in return any express engagement or promise of performance from the of a `unilateral' CONTRACT is that neither party is bound until the promi-see accepts the offer by performing the proposed consists of a promise for an act, the acceptance consisting of the performance of the act requested, rather than the promise to perform it.

10 INVITATION TO TREAT: When one party ford not make an offer but invites the other party to do so. OFFER: A willingness to CONTRACT of specified terms, made with the intention that it is to become bind-ing as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed. CONSIDERATION: Anything of value promised to another when making a CONTRACT . It can take the form of money, physical objects, services, promised actions, abstinence from future actions, etc. FORMATION OF THE AGREEMENT: OFFER + ACCEPTANCE OFFER AND INVITATION TO TREAT Canadian Dyers Assocatian Ltd. v Burton (1920), 47 259 ( ) RATIO: THE OBJECTIVE TEST: Would a reasonable person, in analyzing the words and ac-tions of the parties, conclude that on balance of probabilities a CONTRACT was made, that there was an intention to be bound by the terms of the offer?


Related search queries