Effectiveness Technical Compliance

1 04/09/2018updated 4 September 2018 Table of ratings for assessment conducted against the 2012 FATF Recommendations, using the 2013 FATF MethodoTechnical ComplianceFATF MethodologyFATF RecommendationsJurisdiction (click on the country name to go to the report on )Report TypeReport DateAssessment body/bodies + FURDec/17 FATFMESEMEMEMELELEMESEMESELCLCLCCCPCPCPC A ustriaMERSep/16 FATFMESEMEMEMELELEMESEMESEPCPCLCCCPCPCPC A ustriaFURDec/17 FATFMESEMEMEMELELEMESEMESELCLCLCCCPCPCPC B ahamasMERAug/17 CFATFLEMEMEMEMEMELELELELELEPCPCCCLCNCPCP CB ahrainMERSep/18 FATF/MENAFATFMESESEMEMESEMEMEMEMEMEPCLCL CCPCPCPCLCB angladeshMERNov/16 APGMESEMELELEMELELESEMESEPCLCLCLCLCCLCLC B arbadosMERFeb/18 CFATFLEMEMEMEMELELELELELELEPCLCLCPCLCLCN CNCB elgiumMERApr/16 FATFSESEMEMEMESEMEMESEMEMELCLCCCLCPCPCPC B elgiumFURSep/18 FATFSESEMEMEMESEMEMESEMEMECCCCCPCPCLCB hutan MERNov/16 APGLEMELELELELELELEMELELENCPCPCPCNCNCNCP CB otswanaMERMay/17 ESAAMLGLEMELELELEMELELELELELENCPCPCPCNCN CNCNCC ambodiaMERSep/17 APGMEMELELELELELELESEMELEPCPCLCLCLCLCNCP CC anadaMERSep/16 IMF/FATF/APGSESESEMELEMEMEMESESEMELCCCLC LCLCLCCC osta Rica MER+FUROct/17 GAFILATMESEMEMELEMEMEMEMELELELCCCLCCLCCP CC osta Rica MERDec/15 GAFILATMESEMEMELEMEMEMEMELELEPCPCLCLCPCP CNCNCC osta Rica FUR1 Oct/16

2 GAFILATMESEMEMELEMEMEMEMELELELCCCLCCPCPC NCC osta Rica FUR2 Oct/17 GAFILATMESEMEMELEMEMEMEMELELELCCCLCCLCCP CCubaMER+FUROct/17 GAFILATMEMESEMESEMEMESESESEMELCCLCLCCCLC PCCubaMERDec/15 GAFILATMEMESEMESEMEMESESESEMELCCLCLCCCLC PCCubaFUROct/17 GAFILATMEMESEMESEMEMESESESEMELCCLCLCCCLC PCD enmarkMERAug/17 FATFMESELELEMEMEMEMESEMESEPCPCLCLCCPCPCP CE thiopiaMERJun/15 ESAAMLG/WBLEMELELEMELELELELELELENCPCLCLC LCNCNCPCFijiMER + FUROct/17 APGMEMEMEMELEMEMELELELELELCPCLCCCPCPCPCF ijiMERNov/16 APGMEMEMEMELEMEMELELELELEPCPCLCCPCNCNCPC FijiFUROct/17 APGMEMEMEMELEMEMELELELELELCPCLCCCPCPCPCG hanaMERApr/18 GIABAMESEMELELEMEMELELELELELCLCCLCLCLCLC NCG uatemalaMERFeb/17 CFATF/ GAFILATMESEMEMEMESESESEMEMEMELCCLCLCPCPC PCLCH ondurasMERJan/17 GAFILATMESEMEMELEMEMEHESEMELEPCLCLCCLCLC PCLCH ungaryMER + FURMar/18 MONEYVALLESEMEMELESELELEMEMEMELCLCLCCPCL CLCPCH ungaryMERSep/16 MONEYVALLESEMEMELESELELEMEMEMEPCPCLCCPCP CPCPCH ungaryFURMar/18 MONEYVALLESEMEMELESELELEMEMEMELCLCLCCPCL CLCPCI celandMERApr/18 FATFLESELELELEMEMEMEMELELEPCPCCLCLCPCPCN CI relandMERSep/17 FATFSESESEMEMESEMEMEMEMESELCLCCCLCPCPCPC Isle of ManMERFeb/17 MONEYVALSESEMEMEMELELELEMEMEMELCCCLCLCLC LCLCI talyMERFeb/16 IMF/FATFSESEMEMESESESESESEMESELCLCLCCCLC PCLCJ amaicaMERJan/17 CFATFMEMEMELELEMELESELELELEPCPCLCLCLCNCP CNCM acao, ChinaMERDec/17 APGMESESEMESESELELEMESESELCLCLCCLCCCLCM alaysiaMERSep/15 APG/FATFSEMESEMEMESEMEMEMESEMELCCLCLCLCC PCLCE ffectivenessRatings that reflect the extent to which a country's measures are effective.

3 The assessment is conducted on the basis of 11 immediate outcomes, which represent key goals that an effective AML/CFT system should achieve. For more information see: FATF MethodologyRatings which reflect the extent to which a country has implemented the Technical requirements of the FATF more information see:04/09/2018 Jurisdiction (click on the country name to go to the report on )Report TypeReport DateAssessment body/bodies + FURMar/18 FATFMESEMEMEMEMEMEMESEMEMELCLCCCCPCCLCN orwayMERDec/14 FATFMESEMEMEMEMEMEMESEMEMEPCPCCLCLCPCPCL CN orwayFURMar/18 FATFMESEMEMEMEMEMEMESEMEMELCLCCCCPCCLCP anamaMERJan/18 GAFILATLEMEMEMELELEMEMEMESESELCLCPCCLCLC LCLCP ortugalMERDec/17 FATFSESEMEMEMEMESEMESESESELCLCLCCLCCCPCS amoaMER + FUROct/17 APGMESELEMEMELELEMEMEMELEPCLCPCLCPCPCNCP CS amoaMEROct/15 APGMESELEMEMELELEMEMEMELEPCPCPCLCPCPCNCP CS amoaFUROct/17 APGMESELEMEMELELEMEMEMELEPCLCPCLCPCPCNCP CS erbiaMERJun/16 MONEYVALMEMEMEMEMEMELEMEMELELEPCLCLCLCLC PCNCPCS ingaporeMERSep/16 FATF/APGSESEMEMEMESEMEMELEMESELCCLCCLCLC LCLCS loveniaMERAug/17 MONEYVALMESEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEPCLCLCLCPC PCPCPCS painMER + FURMar/18 FATFSESESEMESEHESESESEMEMECLCLCCCPCPCLCS painMERDec/14 FATFSESESEMESEHESESESEMEMECLCLCCLCPCPCLC S painFURMar/18 FATFSESESEMESEHESESESEMEMECLCLCCCPCPCLCS ri LankaMER + FURJul/16 APGMELELELELELELELESELELEPCLCLCPCCLCNCPC Sri LankaMEROct/15 APGMELELELELELELELESELELEPCPCLCPCCLCNCPC Sri

4 LankaFURJul/16 APGMELELELELELELELESELELEPCLCLCPCCLCNCPC S wedenMERApr/17 FATFMEHEMEMEMEMESESESEMESELCPCLCLCLCPCPC LCS wedenFURJul/18 FATFMEHEMEMEMEMESESESEMESELCCLCLCLCPCPCL CS witzerlandMERDec/16 FATFSEMEMEMEMESESESESESESELCLCLCLCLCLCCP CT hailandMERDec/17 APGSESEMELELESEMESEMEMELEPCLCLCLCLCLCNCP CT rinidad and TobagoMERJun/16 CFATFMEMEMEMEMEMELELELELELEPCLCLCLCCPCNC NCT unisiaMER + FURDec/17 MENAFATFMEMELELELEMEMEMELELELELCPCCLCLCP CNCPCT unisiaMERJun/16 MENAFATF/ WBMEMELELELEMEMEMELELELEPCPCCLCCPCNCLCT unisiaFURDec/17 MENAFATFMEMELELELEMEMEMELELELELCPCCLCLCP CNCPCU gandaMERSep/16 ESAAMLGLELELELELELELELELELELENCPCPCLCNCN CNCNCU kraineMERJan/18 MONEYVALSEMEMEMEMESELEMEMEMEMELCCLCLCPCP CPCLCU nited StatesMERDec/16 FATF/APGSESEMEMELESESEHEHEHEHEPCCLCLCCLC LCLCV anuatuMER + FURNov/17 APGLELELELELELELELELELELENCNCNCPCPCPCNCN CV anuatuMEROct/15 APGLELELELELELELELELELELENCNCNCPCPCPCNCN CV anuatuFURNov/17 APGLELELELELELELELELELELENCNCNCPCPCPCNCN CZ imbabweMERJan/17 ESAAMLGLELELELELELELELEMEMELEPCLCCPCCCNC NC04/09/2018updated 4 September 2018 Jurisdiction (click on the country name to go to the report on )ArmeniaAndorraAustraliaAustriaAustriaAu striaBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBel giumBelgiumBhutan BotswanaCambodiaCanadaCosta Rica Costa Rica Costa Rica Costa Rica CubaCubaCubaDenmarkEthiopiaFijiFijiFijiG hanaGuatemalaHondurasHungaryHungaryHunga ryIcelandIrelandIsle of ManItalyJamaicaMacao, (click on the country name to go to the report on )MexicoMongoliaNicaraguaNorwayNorwayNorw ayPanamaPortugalSamoaSamoaSamoaSerbiaSin gaporeSloveniaSpainSpainSpainSri LankaSri LankaSri LankaSwedenSwedenSwitzerlandThailandTrin idad and TobagoTunisiaTunisiaTunisiaUgandaUkraine United 4 September 2018 Jurisdiction (click on the country name to go to the report on )

5 ArmeniaAndorraAustraliaAustriaAustriaAus triaBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelg iumBelgiumBhutan BotswanaCambodiaCanadaCosta Rica Costa Rica Costa Rica Costa Rica CubaCubaCubaDenmarkEthiopiaFijiFijiFijiG hanaGuatemalaHondurasHungaryHungaryHunga ryIcelandIrelandIsle of ManItalyJamaicaMacao, #upgrades#downgradesLCLCLCLCLCCLCPCLCLCL CLCPCLCCCCCCLCLCLCCLC10 CLCLCLCCLCCLCLCLCCLC10 PCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCPCLCLCLCLCLCLCPC LCPCLCLCLCCLCLCLCLCCCLCLCLCLC15 PCPCNCNCLCPCNCPCLCPCPCPCPCLCPCPCLCPCLCCL CLCCLCPCCCLCCCPCCCLCCCPCCCLCCC11 PCCCLCCC5 PCLCLCLCLCLCPCLCLCLCLCLCPCLCLCLCLCLC1 PCLCLCLCLCLCLCPCLCLCLCNCLCPCLCCPCLCPCPCL CCPCLCLCPCLCCPCLC11 PCCLCLCPCLCPCCLCLCLCLCPCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLC LCLCLC13 PCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLC13 PCLCLCLCLCLCLCCCLCCLCPCLCLCLCCLCPCCLCLCC LCPCLCCLCCPCCLCCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLC04/09/ 2018 Jurisdiction (click on the country name to go to the report on )MexicoMongoliaNicaraguaNorwayNorwayNorw ayPanamaPortugalSamoaSamoaSamoaSerbiaSin gaporeSloveniaSpainSpainSpainSri LankaSri LankaSri LankaSwedenSwedenSwitzerlandThailandTrin idad and TobagoTunisiaTunisiaTunisiaUgandaUkraine United #upgrades#downgradesLCLCPCPCLCLCPCCCLCLC LCPCLCLCLCLCLCPCCLCLCLCLC8 PCCLCLCLCLCPCCLCLCLCLC8 LCCLCLCLCLCLCCLCCCLCPCPCLCLCLCLCPCPCLCLC LCLCPCPCLCLCLCLC1 PCLCLCLCLCPCPCCLCLCLCLCCLCLCLCLCLCCCCCCC 3 CCCCLCCCCCCCC3 PCLCPCPCLCPCPCLCPCPCLCPCPCLCPCPCLCPC9 LCCLCLCCCLCCLCLCCC10 PCLCLCLCLCPCPCLCLCCLCLCPCLCPCPCLCPCLCLCC PCCLCLCPCCPCCLCLCLCCPCCLC122 PCCPCPCNCPCPCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCLCCPCPCPC NCPCNCPCPCPCNCPCNCPCPCPCNCPCNC2 LCCCLCCLCThe body or bodies who conducted the mutual evaluation.

6 Click on the links for more Group on Money Laundering CFATFC aribbean Financial Action Task ForceEAGE urasian Group ESAAMLGE astern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group GABACTask Force on Money Laundering in Central Africa GAFILATF inancial Action Task Force of Latin AmericaGIABAI nter Governmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West AfricaMENAFATFM iddle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force MONEYVALC ouncil of Europe Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of TerrorismIMFI nternational Monetary FundWBWorld Bank HEHigh level of Effectiveness - The Immediate Outcome is achieved to a very large extent. Minor improvements level of Effectiveness - The Immediate Outcome is achieved to a large extent. Moderate improvements level of Effectiveness - The Immediate Outcome is achieved to some extent. Major improvements level of Effectiveness - The Immediate Outcome is not achieved or achieved to a negligible extent.

7 Fundamental improvements laundering and terrorist financing risks are understood and, where appropriate, actions co-ordinated domestically to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and co-operation delivers appropriate information, financial intelligence, and evidence, and facilitates action against criminals and their appropriately supervise, monitor and regulate financial institutions and DNFBPs for Compliance with AML/CFT requirements commensurate with their institutions and DNFBPs adequately apply AML/CFT preventive measures commensurate with their risks, and report suspicious persons and arrangements are prevented from misuse for money laundering or terrorist financing, and information on their beneficial ownership is available to competent authorities without intelligence and all other relevant information are appropriately used by competent authorities for money laundering and terrorist financing laundering offences and activities are investigated and offenders are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive and instrumentalities of crime are financing offences and activities are investigated and persons who finance terrorism are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive , terrorist organisations and terrorist financiers are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, and from abusing the NPO and entities involved in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, consistent with the relevant compliant - There are only minor compliant - There are moderate shortcomings.

8 Assessment BodiesRatings that reflect the extent to which a country's measures are effective. The assessment is conducted on the basis of 11 immediate outcomes, which represent key goals that an effective AML/CFT system should achieve. See the FATF Methodology for more OutcomesRatings which reflect the extent to which a country has implemented the Technical requirements of the FATF Recommendations. See the FATF Recommendations and the FATF Methodology for more information. Technical Compliance NCNon-compliant - There are major shortcomings. NANot applicable - A requirement does not apply, due to the structural, legal or institutional features of the country. AML/CFT Policies and Risks and Applying a Risk-Based cooperation and coordinationMoney Laundering and laundering and provisional measuresTerrorist Financing and Financing of financing financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financial sanctions related to organisationsPreventive institution secrecy due exposed or value transfer on third controls and foreign branches and of suspicious and : Customer due : Other measuresTransparency and Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons and and beneficial ownership of legal and beneficial ownership of legal arrangementsPowers and Responsibilities of Competent Authorities and Other Institutional and supervision of financial of and supervision of intelligence of law enforcement and investigative of law enforcement and investigative and legal legal assistance: freezing and forms of international cooperationRecommendations