Transcription of 日EU・EPA等の経済効果分析 - cas.go.jp
1 1 2016 10 50 80 1. 2017 12 8 22 12 Economic Partnership Agreement 2.
2 2016 Trans-Pacific Partnership 21 2017 11 2017 11 3. 2 4. 2015 12 2015 1 5.
3 2015 Global Trade Analysis Project 2 2015 6. European Commission 2012 3 2017 50 50 4 1 ( #keizaikoukabunseki) 2 3 European Commission (2012), Impact Assessment Report on EU-Japan Trade Relations, ( ) 4 2017 GRIPS Discussion Paper, 16-27 Overall Trade Restrictiveness Index 2015 3 7.
4 10 20 5 8. 2013 4 HS2012 6 5 2015 ,21 6 Combined Nomenclature 2013 CN2013 4 9. 2015 Logistics Performance Index 7 10.
5 11. 2015 12. Global Value Chains 8 9 13. 2015 7 2016 Logistics Performance Index, ( ) 2015 8 Kowalski, P.
6 Et al. (2015), Participation of Developing Countries in Global Value Chains: Implications for Trade and Trade-Related Policies OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 179, OECD Publishing, Paris. 9 Zhai, F. (2008) Armington Meets Melitz: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity in a Global CGE Model of Trade, Journal of Economic Integration 23(3), 575-604. 5 14. 15. 10 16.
7 11 10 2015 ,34 11 2017 6 17. 2016 2016 12 18. 2015 19. 2015 20.
8 13 2016 2016 46 21. 22 7 12 14 12 2030 610 182 790 13 Peter A. Petri, Michael G. Plummer, Shujiro Urata, and Fan Zhai (2017 Going It Alone in the Asia-Pacific: Regional Trade Agreements Without the United States PIIE Working Paper 17-10, October 2017.)
9 2017 7 2016 14 15 22. 2015 23. 2015 16 14 2017 , World Economic Outlook Database, October 2017, 15 2017 16 2015 2013 8 2015 9 24.
10 2016 154 23 22 40 2016 17 25. 18 17 2017 18 ( #seisakutaikou)
