Evidence-Based Counseling: Implications for Counseling ...

1 1999 EDO-CG-99-9 Evidence-Based Counseling : Implications for CounselingPractice, Preparation, and ProfessionalismThomas L. SextonThe practice of professional Counseling , like that ofpsychology and social work has its roots in the early humanistic,behavioral, and cognitive theoretical traditions. Lessons fromthe outcome and process research were only distant voices inthe background. This early bifurcation between practice andresearch evolved into a fairly wide research-practice gap thathas plagued the practice of professional Counseling for the lasttwo major issues make the artificial dicotomy betweenresearch and practice not only irrelevant but also potentiallyharmful to the current and future status of Counseling practiceand preparation.

2 First, most practitioners know that today slandscape of Counseling practice is one dominated byaccountability. In fact, many have claimed that accountabilityis now a primary principles of professional practice a principlemore important than theory congruence or philosophicalallegiance (Sexton, Schofield, & Whiston, 1997). In this era of accountability, concerns for service costs, interventioneffectiveness, and research supported best practice are theprimary factor in much clinical and administrative decisionmaking.

3 Thus, research, because of its focus on outcome, isnow a major factor in the real world practice of , the Counseling process and outcomeresearch has grown into an undeniably reliable, valid, andnecessary source of clinical practice knowledge. There is noquestion that much of the early research was irrelevant topractice. It was conducted on isolated issues in settings withlittle connection to the complex world of the practitioner (e. Psychology 101 students). This research producedcontradictory evidence, the presentation of which was mostoften followed by the caveat.

4 Our results show that moreresearch needs to be done in this area. However, as one wouldexpect, the methods of clinical research have evolved to thepoint such that many of the early problems of clinical relevanceare no longer of concern. Today there is a large and everincreasing body of applicable and relevant research that is nowan invaluable source guidance for both the general practice ofcounseling and the application of Counseling to specificproblems and populations (Sexton, 1997). In fact, the researchevidence has become so reliable that the term best practices is now defined as approaches to Counseling practice that haveempirical evidence to support their of one s position in regard to the art or research vs.

5 Practice debate, it seems clear thatevidence-based Counseling practice is the future of both thepreparation of Counseling and the practice of professionalcounseling. The integration of research into practice throughan Evidence-Based approach to Counseling actually brings thebest elements of practice, clinical experience and reliabletreatment protocols together to serve the task of helping clientswith the complex problems they bring to Counseling . Whatfollows are a number of the broad Implications for both thepreparation of counselors and the practice of Counseling .

6 Implications of Evidence-Based Counseling PracticeThe specific Implications of the accumulated body ofresearch on Counseling practices are well beyond the scope ofthis article (see references for further sources). Research hasclearly established the efficacy of individual, group, and familycounseling for a variety of presenting client concerns (Sexton,Whiston, Bleuer, & Walz, 1997). More important for practice,research now points to a number of very stable trends thatsupport the efficacy of some practices of Counseling over others,the differential value of some aspects of Counseling over others,and effectiveness of matching certain client problems withspecific Counseling models (Sexton et.)

7 Al, 1997). These trendsinform Counseling practice and preparation and form the basisof an Evidence-Based model of broad trends can be categorized in two domainseach with significant Implications for the general practice ofcounseling: findings about clinical models and findings aboutthe counselor. There has been considerable attention todetermining the most valuable clinical models. Whilecounseling is, in most cases, effective, there is no best theoretical approach. The outcome research evidence hasrepeatedly found that theoretical orientation is not a major factorin the outcome of Counseling .

8 Instead, the research points to aset of common factors that seem to be part of effectivecounseling regardless of counselor, client, or theoreticalorientation. According to Lambert (1991) approximately 30%of outcome is attributable to common factors evident in alltherapies regardless of theory. Of the remaining variance, 40%is attributable to factors outside of Counseling , another 15% toclient expectation, and the final 15% to specific psychologicaltechniques. Most of the current theoretical descriptions of thesecommon factors point to broad areas of: (1) the supportive valueof a collaborative Counseling relationship (Sexton & Whiston,1994); (2) the value of learning (through affective experiencing,corrective emotional experiences, and skills acquisition); and(3) action (through behavior change, successful experiences,behavioral regulation, and mastery).

9 While specific theoretical models do not seem importantto positive outcome, Evidence-Based Counseling interventionprotocols are differentially effective with the client problemsthey were developed to help. These protocols are systematicintervention models, usually manual based, with an extensivecollection of efficacy and effectiveness research in multiplesettings, with diverse client groups, across various counselors,that produce clinically significant results both in controlled labsand community settings that last for long periods of time(Sexton, et al.)

10 , 1997). Called Empirically Supported Treatments(EST), such protocols are available for many individualproblems (anxiety disorders, depression, etc.) and familyproblems (see discussion of Functional Family Therapy inERIC DigestFor information on other ERIC/CASS products and services, please call toll-free (800) 414-9769 or (336) 334-4114 or fax (336) 334-4116 or write ERIC/CASS,School of Education, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC , Sexton, & Robbins, in press). While the professionaland conceptual issues surrounding empirically supported treatmentsare considerable and the criteria likely to evolve, they are a valuableresource for practicing counselors when faced with certain clientproblems.