Example: bachelor of science

GMP Cold Storage Warehouse Audit Checklist - …

2 0 0 0 Powell St reet , St e. 6 0 0. Emeryville, CA 9 4 6 0 8 USA. +1 .5 1 0 .4 5 2 .8 0 0 0 main +1 .5 1 0 .4 5 2 .6 8 8 6 f ax GMP cold Storage Warehouse Audit Checklist Auditor Name Rebecca Anderson Auditor's contact phone number Auditor's email address SCS Contact Person David Hernick SCS Contact Phone # SCS Contact Email Audited Facility Name The Berry Man Audited Facility Address (include full address) 205 W. Montecito St. Santa Barbara, CA 93101. Contact Person Jean Pierre Jammet Phone Number Fax Number Email Address jpjammet @t Has the Facility Inspected by Government Authority?

This rating system describes the status of processing, packing, storage operations in regards to food safety issues associated with the particular operations they perform.

Tags:

  Checklist, Safety, Audit, Storage, Cold storage warehouse audit checklist, Cold, Warehouse

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of GMP Cold Storage Warehouse Audit Checklist - …

1 2 0 0 0 Powell St reet , St e. 6 0 0. Emeryville, CA 9 4 6 0 8 USA. +1 .5 1 0 .4 5 2 .8 0 0 0 main +1 .5 1 0 .4 5 2 .6 8 8 6 f ax GMP cold Storage Warehouse Audit Checklist Auditor Name Rebecca Anderson Auditor's contact phone number Auditor's email address SCS Contact Person David Hernick SCS Contact Phone # SCS Contact Email Audited Facility Name The Berry Man Audited Facility Address (include full address) 205 W. Montecito St. Santa Barbara, CA 93101. Contact Person Jean Pierre Jammet Phone Number Fax Number Email Address jpjammet @t Has the Facility Inspected by Government Authority?

2 ( , Local County, State, FDA) USDA, CDFA, County Health Does this facility Audit their supplier either through a first/second/third party Audit ? Third Party Audit What other type of Audit has been conducted at this facility ( , Organic, SQF, FPA, Organic BRC). Type of Primary Packaging ( , poly, cardboard boxes, etc) Bags, cartons, plastic containers, mesh bags, cardboard boxes, and RPC. Type of Secondary Packaging ( , poly, cardboard boxes, etc) Corrugated boxes Channels of Trade (Retail, Wholesale, International, etc.)

3 Wholesale and Retail Hours of Operation 24 hours Months of Operation ( , January - December) Year round. Number of Employees 18 as of January. Year Built Unknown. Ownership since 1960. Year(s) Updated None recently Size of Facility 16,000 sq. ft. Property Size 20,000 sq. ft. Neighboring Land Use Warehouse and Residential Building Material, Exterior Walls Concrete Building Material, Interior Walls Concrete Building Material, Floors Concrete and Epoxy Building Material, Exterior Roof Concrete Building Material, Interior Ceiling Metal Areas of the Facility Excluded from the Audit Kitchen/Catering Date of Audit Exit Meeting 2/6/2014.

4 Length of Audit 3 hours Facility Personnel Jean Pierre Jammet Date of Last Audit 2/6/2013. Product(s) Handled Fresh produce, herbs/spices, dairy, eggs, soy products, frozen products, and dry goods. Facility Construction and Design 4 Storage rooms and one freezer. One receiving dock at one end, 2 shipping docks and other loading docks at the front. Office, break rooms, and restrooms segregated from the faciltiy. Brief Description of the Process Receiving, Storage , some items are repacked or bagged before shipping, and distribution on company trucks.

5 Food safety Total Score ( 80% Satisfactory per SCS Rating system) Rating Superior Version 7 -0 ( August 2 0 1 3 ) | SCS Global Services GMP cold Storage Food safety Assessment Detailed Report & Final Summary Score Category/Subcategory Food safety Section Other Section Points Points Scored Points Possible Percent (%) Points Scored Percent (%). Possible SECTION A: GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Management Commitment and Review N/A N/A N/A 15 15 Employee Practices 20 20 39 39 Training and Education 22 22 20 20 Sanitary Facilities 35 40 46 53 Water N/A N/A N/A 8 8 Grounds 20 20 18 18 Building Size, Construction and Design 50 50 33 36 Pest Control Program and Procedures 60 60 44 48 Procedures 50 50 84 87 Cleaning Equipment and Chemicals 20 20 18 18 Cleaning, Sanitation and Housekeeping 20 20 55 55 Preventive Maintenance Program N/A N/A N/A 14 14 Receiving.

6 Storage and Distribution 20 20 40 40 SECTION B: HACCP PLAN AND PROCESS. PRACTICES. Management Commitment and Review N/A N/A N/A 7 7 HACCP/Hazard Prevention Program 150 150 36 36 Allergens 10 10 14 14 Training and Education 30 30 28 28 SECTION C: DOCUMENT CONTROL. Document Control N/A N/A N/A 24 24 TOTAL SCORE 507 512 543 560 Food safety (GMP) Final Summary Points Scored Points Possible % Percentage Food safety Section 507 512 Other Section 543 560 TOTAL SCORE 1050 1072 Version 7 -0 ( August 2 0 1 3 ) | SCS Global Services Audit SCORING SYSTEM.

7 SCORE RATING DESCRIPTION DOCUMENTATION COMPLIANCE. 10 pts 7 pts 4 pts AUTO Automatic Unsatisfactory (Refer to next page). N/A N/A N/A N/A Not Applicable Not Applicable The particular question doesn't apply to the The particular question doesn't apply to the facility in question or are not controlled at the facility in question or are not controlled at facility. the facility. 0 0 0 US Unsatisfactory Unsatisfactory Critical food safety hazards, which compromise A) No written Food safety Program in place. the safety of the product, are observed.

8 B) Records Review: No records available. 1 1 1 NI Needs Improvement Needs Improvement Serious food safety hazards, which may eventually A) Written Food safety Program in place compromise the safety of the product, are and/or needs serious improvement. observed. Significant improvements in B) Records Review: Very few records may be operational practices and procedures are needed available and/or current. to avoid food safety hazards. 3 2 2 NI Needs Improvement Needs Improvement Major food safety hazards, which may not A) Written Food safety Program in place immediately compromise the safety of the and/or needs major improvement.

9 Product, are observed. Partial improvements in B) Records Review: Some records may be operational practices and procedures are needed unavailable and/or current. to avoid food safety hazards. 5 4 3 NI Needs Improvement Needs Improvement Minor food safety hazards, which may not A) Written Food safety Program in place immediately compromise the safety of the and/or needs minor improvement. product, are observed. Minimum improvements B) Records Review: Very few records may be in operational practices and procedures are unavailable and/or not current.

10 Needed to avoid food safety hazards. 10 7 4 S Satisfactory Satisfactory No food safety hazards are observed. Meets the A) A complete written Food safety Program intent of the Checklist in design and execution. in place. B) Records Review: All records are available and kept current. Food safety Assessment Rating System This rating system describes the status of processing, packing, Storage operations in regards to food safety issues associated with the particular operations they perform. It should be noted that it is not possible to completely eliminate the risk of contamination associated with production (GMPs) / food environment.


Related search queries