Example: confidence
In the Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 12, 2021 · Respondents, who were defendants in the state court proceedings, are Kathy Hochul, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Dr. Howard A. Zucker, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, and Letitia James, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov4 . v. HODGES OBERGEFELL Syllabus . Finally, this Court’s cases and the Nation’s traditions make clear that marriage is a keystone of the Nation’s social order.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. GREENE’S ENERGY GROUP, LLC Syllabus . 1. Inter partes review does not violate Article III. Pp. 5–17. (a) Under this Court’s precedents, Congress has significant lati-
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedoms asserted here are both the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govcite as: 583 u. s. ____ (2017) 1 breyer, j., dissenting supreme court of the united states nos. 16–9448 and 17–5083 quentin marcus truehill 16–9448 v. florida . on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 585 U. S. ____ (2018) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the …
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedoms asserted here are both the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N Syllabus and cable television. Concerned about possible civil and criminal penalties for violating §441b, it sought declaratory and injunctive re-
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 . v. UNITED STATES CARPENTER Syllabus . prepared to recognize as reasonable,” official intrusion into that sphere generally qualifies as a search and requires a warrant sup
(ORDER LIST: 585 U.S.) MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2018 …
www.supremecourt.govThe judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the ; United States District Court for the Middle District of North : Carolina for further consideration in light of Gill v.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 FLORIDA v.GEORGIA Syllabus . sets of principles guide the Court’s review. First, both Georgia and Florida possess “an equal right to make a reasonable use of the wa ...
Related documents
PARTICULARS OF CLAIM - Forensics For Justice
www.forensicsforjustice.orgJan 02, 2019 · Commissioner of Police who is employed with the South African Police Service c/o The ... The said police officials who included the fifth, sixth and eighth defendants, were acting within the course and scope of their employment of the South African Police Service. 16.8. As a result of the foregoing the first plaintiff was unlawfully deprived of his
PRO SE HANDBOOK FOR CIVIL SUITS - United States Courts
www.txnd.uscourts.govD. Who are the right defendants? You may only sue defendants whom you believe are responsible for a wrong you have suffered. When you write your complaint, include facts (such as specific dates, names, and events) that support the relief you seek against each person you have sued. Listing a name in the caption of the complaint is not enough.
42 USC Section 1983- Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
www.fsfac.orgDenver, Colorado police officer, brought suit under the wrongful death statute of the State of Colorado and for the intentional deprivation of her son's civil rights without due process of law, under U.S.C. Section 1983, both in Colorado state court.4 Mrs. Jones sought $1,500,000.00 in compensatory damages and $250,000.00 in punitive damages.