MILITARY STANDARD - Product lifecycle

1 MILSTD-6b(USAFl) mR4 JUNEl=SUPERSEDINGMIL-SD-l~AlUSAm,1 JUNE1976 MILITARYSTANDARDTECHNICALREVIEWSANDAUDIT SSYSTEMS,EQUIPMENTS,ANDCOMPUTERSOFIWAREI }AM:CIuO.!=?637 AaEACMAN .---~!~~,i~ H;C?iuiA,ewifi~TA.~pp~veotorpUIJtICr , !Technicalitevie ~san~ ,Equipments, (recommendations,additions,deletions)and anypertinentdatawhichmaybeofusainimprovi ngthisdocumentshouldbeaedressedto:Comman der,liqtXD/ALET,HanscomAFB,MA01731byusin gthese~f-addressedStandardizationDocumen tImprovementProposal(DDForm1426) ::n:technologicaladvanceme!?tandmafiage! ne?tprocedures:nconductingreviewsandauti its. oi. i;;/~,,. -,. * (SIR)..SystemDesignReview(SIR)..Software SpecificationReview(SIR)..PreliminaryDes ignReview( (cOR)..TestReadinessReview(TM)..Function alConfigurationAudit(FCA)..PhysicalConfi gurationAudit(PA)..FormalQualificationRe view(FAR)..ProductionReadinessReview(PAR ).)

2 ,.. :55::6-i9; (?O.)..SampleCertificationAttachment(Pm) ..APPENDIXESS ystemRequirementsReviewSystemDesignRevie w(SDR)(SRR)..SIR)..SoftwareSpecification ReviewPreliminaryDesignReview(PDRC riticalDesignReview(CDR)..TestReadinessR eviev(TAR)..FunctionalConfigurationAudit (FCA)..PhysicalConfigurationAudit(PA)..F ormalQualificationReview(FAR).. (P!7R)..Page16;;96 Page19233133536971l7583117123vi1 MIL-STD-J5Z1S10 InSE~lO? :heconductorTechnicalRe%iewsandAuditsonS ystens,Equipments, ,Definitions, ~(S2R)SystemDesignReview(SDR)SoftwareSpe cificationReview(SSR)PreliminaryDesignRe view(?DR]CriticalDesignRevie 4(CiIR)TestReadinessReview(TRR)Functiona lConfigurationAudit(FCA)?hysicalConfigur ationAudit(PCA)FormalQualificationReview (FQR)ProductionReadinessReview(PRR) ,StatementofWork(sow), ( , standards ,dravings,andpublicationsrequi redbycontractorsinconnectionwithspecific procurementfunctionsshouldbeobtainedf?))

3 Omthecontractingagencyofficer). o3/4l (sRR).TheobjectiveofthisreviewIStoascert ainth~qua~thecontractor 1, (SDR).Thisreviewshallbeconductedtoevalua tetheoptlmlzacion,correlation,Completene ss,andrisksassociatedwiththeal~o~ ~erationswillbereviewe~ ~ (SSR).Areviewofthefinalizedcomputersoftw areCo-a:~a(CSCI) sresponsivenesstoandinterpretationofthes ystem,segment, sdeterminationthattheSoftwareRequirement sSpecification,InterfaceRequireme!?tsSpe cification(S),andOperationalConceptDocum entformsatisfactorybasisforproceedingint opreliminarysoftvar~ ;iidu%+%?Wcxra-iK~~Lso~e configurateionitemato(1)lvaluatetheprogr ess,technicaladequacy,andriskresolution( onatechnical,cost,andscheduiebasis)ofthe compatibility elect$rf%Xeap~;~chGn&;!eZ~~eZ~~ia2;~with requirementsoftheHardwareConfigurationIt em(HwCI)developmentspecification,(3) ,and(4) :hecon~iguratioiiitemandotheritemsofequi pment,facilities,c~mputerso:tware, ,thisreviewwillfocuson:(~)theevaluationo ftheprogress,consistency,andtechnicalade qtiacyoftheselectedtop-leveldesignandtes tapproach,(2)comparabilityb:::eensoftwar erequ~reme:;sand, (3) :view,lCDR).

4 (1)detemainethatthedetaildesignoftheconf igurationitemunderreviewsatisfiestheperf ormanceandengineeringspecialtyrequiremen tsoftheHWCI developmentspecifications,(2)lstablishth edetaildesigncompatibilityamongtheconfig urationitemandotheritemsofequipment,faci lities,computersoftwareandpersonnel.(3)a ssessconfigurationitemriskareas(onatechn ical,cost,andschedulebasis).(4)assessthe resultsoftheproducibilityanalysesconduct edonsystemhardware,and(5) ,thisreviewwillfocusonthedeterminationof theacceptabilityofthedetaileddesign,perf ormance,andtestcharacteristicsofthedesig nsolution, (TRR).AreviewconductedforlachCSCItod=mln ewhetherthes~ , , (FCA).Aformalaudittovaliaatethatthedevel opment~ , (pCA)of+ignat~conf;-i~td ~Zhn;z~~;/xZ~!a?%configurationitem (FQR).Thetest,inspection,oranal=processb y~agroupofconfigurationitemscomprisingth esystemareverifiedtohavemetcontractingsp ecificagencycontractualperformancerequir ements(specificationsorequivalent).

5 Thisreviewdoesnothardwareor~cAa;:;ytosof twarerequirementsverifiedatcheindividual configurationitem,l6+ (PRR).Thisrevtod~thestacus~c~ionofthelvi sintendedspecificactionswhichmustbesatis factorilyaceompiis; ;;~~;; ,satisfyaesignrequirements. Thereviewsbecomemorerefinedasthedesignma tures,dealingWithsuchconcernsas productionplanning, ,incorporationofproducibility-orientedch anges, , (withtheirformerterms):OnEquipment1(Orga nizational),OffEquipment-OnSite(Intermed iate),off*~~nt-OffSite(Depot).Seethelate steditionofAFRE quipment14nincenancePolicies,Objectives, ,latestseetheeditionofMIL-STD-280A,Defin itionofitemLevels,ItemExchangeability,Mo dels, , , ~ ~ductlngtheTechnicalReviewsandIAuditsina cco~dancewiththefollowi;grequi- ~ingthatsubcontractors,vendors,andsuppli ersparticipateinformalReviews/Audits, theStatementofWork,theReviews/Auditsshal lbeconductedatthecontractor sfacilityoratadesignatedsubcontractorfac ility, ,thecontractorshallberequiredtoprovideth enecessaryresourcesandmaterialtoperformt heReview/Auditeffec~ ~~efollowingitemstozhelxtentappropriatef orthetypescopeofReview/ (s) , ,manuals,schedules, , , :snlng:fietime,placeandacjendaforeachRev icv/ , ~lo adequaxepreparationforthenee:in~bybothth econtractorandthecontractingagency( ).

6 Inaddition, ,udiEscheduieiscompatiblethewith,availab ilityofthenecessaryinformationandcontrac t141L-sTD-1521 Barticles, ,systemengineeringdata,tradestudyresults ,lproducibilityanalysisresults, ~ ,t!rawicqs,reports,hard= ~sre, ; ,deviations,conclusions, ,andappropriatecommentsshallbereadintoth eofflc~ ssession( ).* (SeeFigure2furSampleActionItemForm). : :ractin~~ParKici~ ,organization, ( ).Thecontractingagencyestablishestheadeq uacyofthecontractor : ~onattachmentareprovided forguida%e purposes(;seeFigures2,3and4).I11/12*..) (asselec:edand/ormodifiedinthecontract) ~. :10,5.~.11systemSystem! ) !lIMIL-STD-1521 BSECf ION6No ! ~ Tecnnlca~ReviewsandAuditsonSys:ems,Equip ments, :is=ottobeincerprecedasapprovalofstateme ntsmadeintheminutesorofmattersdiscusseda ttheaeview/Auditanddoesnotrelievethecont ractorfro=requirementswhichare-apart ~ui~io~chIncorporatesaDDForm1423:Contrac tDataRequirementsListICDRL),thedatarequi rementsidentifiedbelowshallbedevelopedas specifiedbyanapprovedDataItemDescription (DDForm1664) (currentlyrequireme~ )areinvokedandtheDDForm1423isnotur, ; :leAP- plicableDID ) (Dataitemdescriptionsrelatedtothisstanda rd,andidentisection6wiilbeapprovedi~ , , iesofdataitemdescriptrequiredbythecontra ctorsinconnectionwithspeciedDODonsficacq uisition functionsshouldbeobtainedfromthe-NavalPu blicationsandForMSCenterorasdirectedbyth econtractingofficer.

7 :lines%renot~~revision~ntifychangeswi: ( o,.MIL-STD-1521 BCamsa.!lmlBm..IaA= :@UT:ONIIUSIGND lw:.XIG2 YATC!Rb--- - -:I1------ ~ - I17/18 MIL-STD-1521B<APPENDIXAR eview(SRR). beconductedatanytimeMtnormaljyvillbecond uctedaf:ertheaccomplishmentoffunctionala nalysisandpreliminaryrequirementsallocat ion(tooperational/maintenance/trainingHa rdwareConfigurationItems[HWCIS),Computer SoftwareConfigurationItems(CSCIS),facili tyconfig~rationitems,+uanuf-acturingcons iderations,-personnelandhumanfactors)tod etermineiniti-aldirectionandprogressofth econtractor ~ :asnecessary, , } ]. ( ,addressingsystemfunctionsinhardware/fir mware/software)SynthesisLogisticsSupport fialysisSpecialtyDisciplineStudies( ,hardwareandSoftvare,reliabilityanalysis ,maintainabilityaiIialysis,anaamentinteg ration,electromagneticcompatibility,. (includingnuclear),inspectionmethods/tec k3iquesanalysis,energymanagement,-enviro nmentalconsiderations).

8 : ,ranking(theainterrelationshipamongsyste meffectivenessanalysis,technicalperforma ncemeasurement,intendedmanufacturingmeth ods,andcostsshsllbediscussed,asappropria te). >ce/reductionandcontrol(theinterrelation shipswithtrade-offstudies,proofing,testp lanning,hardwareandtechnicalperformancem easurementdiscusses,shallbeesappropriate ). :raintsdesignandresultingengineeringrequ irements/constraints!manufacturingmethod s/processconstraints,andloglstic/costofo wnershiprequirements/ :rade-offstudiesconcuctedcoeva:.~arealte rnativeapproachesandmethcdsf~ , ,schedule,resourcelimitations, ,l::., ,addressthefollowingspecifictradeoffs:e~ atedto: , ,and,forjointservice programs,opportunitiesforinterser~ manufacturingconsiderationswhichcouldimp acttheprogramdecisionsuchascriticalcompo nents,materialsandprocesses, !longleaditems,andfacilities/ tihichthecontractoridentifiesasbeingusef ulltohisanalysisandavailablethroughtheco ntractingagencyshallberequestedpriortoth isreviewoperational/suppOrt( ,,priorstudies,factors,\costfactors,safe tydata,testplan(s),etc.)

9 ,thecontractorshall~~~ !o21/22 (SDR). traceability,oqcimlzatlon,correlation,~o mpleteness,andtheriskoftheallocatedrequi rements,includingthecorrespondingtestreq uirementsinfulfillingthesystem/segmentre quirements(thefunctionalbaseline).Therev iewlncompassesthetotalsystaarequirements , ,operations/maintenance/test/traininqhar dware,computersoftware,facilities,person nel, ginee ringManagementActivities( ,missionlandrequirementsanalysis,functio nalanalysis,requirementsallocation,manuf acturingmerhods/processselection,prugram riskanalysis,system/cosclffectivenessana lysis,logisticssupportanalysis,tradestud ies,intra-andinter-syatemintarfacestudie s,integrateddisciplinestudies,testplanni ng,specialtyandConfigurationManagement) ).ficationgn/costofthesystem(seeSection3 , > (s)$..Aaappropriate:(1)PrimeItemDevelopm entSpecification(2)CriticalItemDevelopme ntSpecificationAnSDRshallbeconductedas thefinalreviewprior% 2t%%%%ittalofthe~ns~~;;~onandvalida;~ye; ph;~;productsorastheinitialDevelopmentsy stlmsnocrequiringaformalDemonstrationand ValidationPhasebutsufficientlycomplextow arranttheformalassessmentoftheallocatedr equirements(andthebasisoftheserequiremen ts) :htheoverallreviewoftheoperational/suppo rtrequirements( ,themissionrequirements),updated/complet etiSystem/SegmentSpecificationrequiremen ts,allocatedperformancerequirements,prog rammingandmanufacturingmethods/processes /planning, :hatthedefinition23 MIL-STD-1521 BAPPENDIXB llffortproductsarenecessarya!

10 ;ar? ,eff~ctivej~ ,ranked,avoided, (particularlyforsensitivemissionrequirem entsversusengineeringrealismandmanufactu ringfeasibilitytosatisfytheanticipatedpr oductionquantitiesofcorrespondingperform ancerequirements) ; ; (e.~.,vorstcaseanalysis,failuremodeandef fectsanalysis,maintainabilityanalysis,an dstandardization.) ,manufacturing,maintenance,logisticsandt estandactivationrequirementshaveaffected overallprogremconcepts:quantitiesandequi pment,unitDefin;%~s,O~a:ag ),productcost(seeSection3,compu:ersoftwa re,personnel, ;n~ ~i=m~ , ,2& ~J alterability(includingnuclear)Reliabilit y/Maintainability/AvailabilityElectromag neticCo~patibiLityLogisticsSupporxAnalys is(toaddressintegrate~logisticssupportin cludingR/M/A)appropriate,l~istlcssupport concept,maintenance,zsupply,:softvaresu~ ,etc.)-SystemSafety(emphasisshallbeplace donsystemhazardanalysisanditienzificatio nofsafetytestrequirements)SecurityHumanF actorsTransportability[ ) ProgramEnvironmentalConditions(Temperatu re,vibration, Shock,Humidity,etc.]