Nr. 8 2005 - Universitatea din Craiova

1 Nr. 8 2005---RRREEEFFFEEERRREEENNNCCCEEESSS--- GHEORGHE VL DU ESCU (Romanian Academy), ALEXANDRU BOBOC (RomanianAcademy), MIHAI CIMPOI (President of the Academy - Republic of Moldova,) CRISTIANPREDA (University of Bucharest), LAURENTIU VLAD (University of Bucharest), VLADIMIROSIAC (University of Craiova ), C 7 LIN BORDEIANU ( Petre Andrei University, Iasi)---IIINNNTTTEEERRRNNNAAATTTIIIOOONN NAAALLLAAADDDVVVIIISSSOOORRRYYYBBBOOOAAA RRRDDD---MMIICCHHAAEELLRRAADDUU,,Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute, Philadelphia, USACo-Chairman, FPRI s Center on Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism and HomelandSecurity, Philadelphia, USAYYOOHHAANNAANNMMAANNOORR,,Professor, University of Jerusalem, IsraelPresident,Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace (CMIP)

2 JJOOZZEEPPIIRRJJEEVVEECC,,Professor,Univ ersity of Trieste, ItalyPPAATTRRIICCIIAAGGOONNZZAALLEEZZ--A ALLDDEEAAR eader,University Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, SpainCCRRIISSTTIINNAABBEEJJAANN,,Wadham College, Oxford, Great BritainSSLLAAVVCCOOAALLMM JJAANN,,Professor, University of Novi Sad, Serbia and MontenegroPresident, Argos Centre for Open Dialogue, Novi Sad, Serbia and MontenegroNNIICCUUCCIIOOBBAANNUUP resident, Libertatea Printing House, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro---EEEDDDIIITTTOOORRRIIIAAALLL BBBOOOAAARRRDDD---Editor in- chief:AAUURREELLPPII UURRCC Consulting Editor:IIOONNDDEEAACCOONNEESSCCUUE ditorial Board.

3 CCEEZZAARRAAVVRRAAMM,,VVLLAADDIIMMIIRROO SSIIAACC,,MMIIHHAAIICCOOSSTTEESSCCUU,,AA NNCCAAPPAARRMMEENNAAPPOOPPEESSCCUU,,CCOO SSMMIINNLLUUCCIIAANNGGHHEERRGGHHEE,,CC TT LLIINNSSTT NNCCIIUULLEESSCCUU,,TTIITTEELLAAVV LLCCEEAANNUU,,MMIIHHAAIIGGHHII UULLEESSCCUULANGUAGE ADVISORTITELA V ppeerriiooddiiccaallssooffnnaattiioonnaa lliinntteerreesstt((TThheeRRoommaanniiaa nnSSiieennttiiffiiccPPuubblliisshheerrss aannddJJoouurrnnaallss--EEvvaalluuaattii oonn,,HHiieerraarrcchhyyaannddRReeccoogg nniittiioonn,,MMaayy1166,,22000055 AAADDDDDDRRREEESSSSSSU niversity of Craiova , 13 Cuza Street, Craiova , 200585, Dolj, Romania, Tel/Fax: +40251418515 2006- Universitaria Printing HouseAll rights reserved.))

4 No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without writtenpermission of the : 1584-224 XUniversity ofCraiova Faculty ofHistory,Philosophy andGeography Department ofPoliticalSciences Revista de tiin e Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques Nr. 8 20055 CCOONNTTEENNTTSSRRROOOMMMAAANNNIIIAAANNN PPPOOOLLLIIITTTIIICCCAAALLLHHHIIISSSTTTO OORRRYYYC ezarAvram,RoxanaRadu,Terror, Manipulation and Demagogy the Way to Absolute om cu,Stages of the Postwar Political Institutional System W linSW nciulescu,Rawls on Political ,Totalitarian and Democratic Political ,The Incidence of State International Responsibilityon the International ,The Defense of Human Rights in the ,This Is Not About Mohammed s ,On Huntington urc ,AncaParmenaPopescu,Islam Religion ofCraiova Faculty ofHistory.

5 Philosophy andGeography Department ofPoliticalSciences Revista de tiin e Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques Nr. 8 20056 MihailSimion,SalaheldinAbdelRehim,The Islam, Human Rightsand Human ,Catholicism and Challenges of Documents Existing during ,September 11 & September ,Globalizing Weakness: Is Global Poverty a Threatto the Interests of States?..102 PPPOOOLLLIIITTTIIICCCSSSAAANNNDDDEEECCCO OONNNOOOMMMIIICCCSSSC ostelMarianIona cu,Statistical Study Regarding to DevelopmentPotential of Oltenia Region. Foundation of Oltenia Region sDevelopement oaraB E O u,General Aspects Regarding Fiscal Evasion at theDomestic and International dinaru,Contractualty betwen Dealers and Consumers inEU Countries and Revista de tiin e Politice.

6 Revue des Sciences Politiques Nr. 8 20057 TTeerrrroorr,,MMaanniippuullaattiioonnaa nnddDDeemmaaggooggyy--tthheeWWaayyttooAA bbssoolluutteePPoowweerrCezar Avram, Roxana RaduAfter the World War II, the communist system has spread very fast inthe shape of people s democracies whose leaders competed withthemselves in order to show their blind submission toward Stalin. TheUSSR s intentions concerning the communisation of the central and south-eastern Europe were hiden through the agency of an intense action ofmanipulation and ideologisation, total control of the civil society, demagogyand broken forgeries, suspicion between social classes and force actionswith a view to obtain control upon a society preoccupied only with thepresence of the army of occupation, the new leading power succeeded indeluding Romanians, Bulgarians, Czechs etc.

7 , directing the social, politicaland economic evolution of the Kremlin s satellites states to a Romania, as well as in all the states that adopted the socialistsystem, the model of dissimulating complusion, violence and class andethnical genocide 1 was put into practice, successful, for a short period oftime, named by Jean Fran ois Soulet frontist 2, through tempting andunselfish promises, in creating, for a great number of Europeans, a state ofenthusiasm and voluntary adhesion, long time forgotten. The hope to createan original democratic system and, through that, a new world relied on somemomentary solutions.

8 Among these solutions stood also the agrarian reformof March 1945, applied under the slogan of egalitarianism and , an ideology born in the middle of the 19th century,referring to property in general, considered that the aim of the revolutionarystruggle is the neccessity of changing the capitalist society into a moreegalitarian system in which collective welfare becomes reality and the pursuitof selfish individual interest subordinates to values as association, communityand cooperation 3. Private property non-existence and communityproperty upon means of production and subsistence were theROMANIAN POLITICAL HISTORYC ezar Avram, Roxana Radu Revista de tiin e Politice.

9 Revue des Sciences Politiques Nr. 8 20058doctrinary pillars for supporting the concept of Communism. Communistprogram promoted mainly the expropriation of capitalists of any kind so thatproductive potential should be used in the frame of non-exploiting socialrelations, in one word, in communism idea of eliminating private property upon land was not a Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist invention. The great majority of Utopian projects crossingthe history of the last two centuries argumented, more or less philosophically,the absolute solution of Paradise on Earth . Not even Fourrier demonstratedoriginality when he launched the associative model.

10 In fact, he establisheda formula having its roots in the tribal community5. Marx, Engels and Leninconsidered that the abolition of property concept would have led to socialhomogeneity. The proletariat, vector of social progress, had to deprive ofgoods not only the bourgeoisie, but also the peasantry. Together with thelandowners dissapearance, social classes also dissapeared automatically andthe state, initially the agent of expropriation, eliminated itself in a short time,making room for a proletariat spread on the surface of the entire communistsociety. The alliance between labourers and peasant workers had to be, in theMarxist-Leninist vision, the prelude of asimilating peasant owners into thenon-homogenous mass of the working class: no finality projects which, putinto practice, caused painful material and human endorsed the theory according to which socialism couldn t bebuilt only in the cities, its building being necessary in the villages too.