Example: bankruptcy

Probability Theory 2 Lecture Notes - pi.math.cornell.edu

Ersonaleducationaluseonlyandarenottob ,Markovchains,andergo dictheorycomesdirectlyfromthecoursetext, o okMarkovChainsandMixingTimesbyDavidLevin ,YuvalPeres,andElizab ' :ThroughProp :Throughde :FinishedSection2 Day8 (Skipp edPolya'sUrn)Day9 :Through rstobservationsab outuniformintegrabilityDay11 :FinishedSection5 Day14 :FinishedSection7 Day17 (Lionel)Day18 (Dan)Day19 :StudentPresentationsDay25:Throughcut-o phenomenonDay26 :FinishedSection11(Skipp edSections12and13)Day28 :ThroughB(d) = i=0Fi(d)ford :FinishedSection15 Day32 :ThroughProp (andsomediscussionofremainingmaterial)Da ys37-42 ( ,F,P)b eaprobabilityspaceandsupp osethatA,B FwithP(B)> ,welearnthattheprobabilityofAconditional onBisde nedasP(A|B) =P(A B)P(B).

PROBABILITY THEORY 2 LECTURE NOTES These lecture notes were written for MATH 6720 at Cornell University in the Spring semester of 2014. They were last revised in the Spring of 2016 and the schedule on the following page

Tags:

  Theory, Probability, Probability theory

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of Probability Theory 2 Lecture Notes - pi.math.cornell.edu

1 Ersonaleducationaluseonlyandarenottob ,Markovchains,andergo dictheorycomesdirectlyfromthecoursetext, o okMarkovChainsandMixingTimesbyDavidLevin ,YuvalPeres,andElizab ' :ThroughProp :Throughde :FinishedSection2 Day8 (Skipp edPolya'sUrn)Day9 :Through rstobservationsab outuniformintegrabilityDay11 :FinishedSection5 Day14 :FinishedSection7 Day17 (Lionel)Day18 (Dan)Day19 :StudentPresentationsDay25:Throughcut-o phenomenonDay26 :FinishedSection11(Skipp edSections12and13)Day28 :ThroughB(d) = i=0Fi(d)ford :FinishedSection15 Day32 :ThroughProp (andsomediscussionofremainingmaterial)Da ys37-42 ( ,F,P)b eaprobabilityspaceandsupp osethatA,B FwithP(B)> ,welearnthattheprobabilityofAconditional onBisde nedasP(A|B) =P(A B)P(B).

2 TheideaisthatifwelearnthatBhaso ccurred,thentheprobabilityspacemustb eup ,thesamplespaceb ecomesB,the -algebranowincludesonlythoseeventscontai nedinB,FB={E B:E F}, (P( |B)alsode nesaprobabilityon( ,F),anditisoftenmoreconvenienttoadoptthi sp ersp ective.)Whenthinkingab outconditionalprobability,itcanb ( ,F,P)asdescribingarandomsystemwhosechanc eofb einginstate ossibleconclusionsthatcanb edrawnab outthestateofthesystem:Allthatcanb esaidiswhetheritliesinAforeachA osethattheobserverhasp erformedameasurementthattellsherifBholds forsomeB FwithP(B) (0,1).IfshefoundoutthatBistrue,herassess mentoftheprobabilityofA Fwouldb eP(A|B).

3 IfshefoundthatBisfalse,shewouldevaluatet heprobabilityofAasP(A|BC).Thus,fromourp ointofview,herdescriptionoftheprobabilit yofAisgivenbytherandomvariableXA( ) ={P(A|B), BP(A|BC), / nitionofP(A|B)totheevents{X=x}and{Y=y}fo rdiscreterandomvariablesX,Yinordertode netheconditionalmassfunctionofXgiventhat Y=yaspX(x|Y=y) =pX,Y(x,y)pY(y).Onethenextrap olatestoabsolutelycontinuousXandYbyrepla cingmassfunctionswithdensities(whichispr oblematicinthatittreatsp dfsasprobabilitiesandraisesissuesconcern ingconditioningonnullevents).Finally,con ditionalexp ectationisde nedintermsofintegratingagainsttheconditi onalpmfs/p ,wewillneedamoresophisticatedtheoryofcon ditioningthatavoidssomeofthepitfalls,par adoxes,andlimitationsoftheframeworksketc hedoutab erde nitionbywayofmorefamiliarconcepts,wewill b eginwithaformalde nitionandthenworkthroughavarietyofexampl esandrelatedresultsinordertoprovidemotiv ation,buildintuition, ( ,F,P)b eaprobabilityspace,X.}

4 ( ,F) (R,B)arandomvariablewithE|X|< ,andG Fasub- neE[X|G],theconditionalexpectationofXgiv enG,tob eanyrandomvariableYsatisfying(i)Y G( ecttoG)(ii) AY dP= AXdPforallA GIfYsatis es(i)and(ii),wesaythatYisaversionofE[X|G ].3 Ourmostimmediateorderofbusinessistoshowt hatthisde nitionmakesgo o ,we rsttakeamomenttoestablishintegrabilityfo rrandomvariableswhich tthede esconditions(i)and(ii)inthede nitionofE[X|G], {Y 0} G,condition(ii)implies AY dP= AXdP A|X|dP, AC( Y)dP= ACY dP= ACX= AC( X)dP AC|X| |Y|= AY dP+ AC( Y)dP A|X|dP+ AC|X|dP=E|X|< . Ournextresultmakesuseofafamoustheoremfro manalysiswhosepro ofcanb (Radon-Niko dym).

5 If and are - nitemeasureson(S,S)with ,thenthereisameasurablefunctionf:S Rsuchthat (A) = Afd foral lA ledtheRadon-Nikodymderivativeof withrespectto ,writtenf=d d .Thefollowingexistencepro ofgivesaninterpretationofconditionalexp ectationintermsofRadon-Niko ( ,F,P)beaprobabilityspace,X: ( ,F) (R,B)arandomvariablewithE|X|< ,andG Fasub- (i)Y G(ii) AY dP= AXdPforal lA osethatX ne (A) = AXdPforA |Gand are nitemeasureson( ,G).(That iscountablyadditiveisaneasyapplicationof theDCT.)Moreover, isclearlyabsolutelycontinuouswithresp dymtheoremthereforeimpliesthatthereisafu nctiond dP Gsuchthat AXdP= (A) = Ad dPisaversionofE[X|G].

6 ForgeneralX,writeX=X+ X andletY1=E[X+|G],Y2=E[X |G].ThenY=Y1 Y2isintegrableandG-measurable,soforallA G, AY dP= AY1dP AY2dP= AX+dP AX dP= AXdP. *Thepro dymtheoremholdsforsignedmeasuresand (A) = Agd de nesasignedmeasurefor nitionofconditionalexp ectation, osethatY isalsoaversionofE[X|G].Condition(ii)impl iesthat AY dP= AXdP= AY dPforallA (i),theeventA ={Y Y }isinGforall >0,hence0 = A Y dP A Y dP= A (Y Y )dP P(Y Y ).ItfollowsthatY Y intheprecedingargumentshowsthatY ,andthepro ofiscomplete. [X|G]andY GwithY=Y ,thenY isalsoaversionofE[X|G]. areG-measurable,E={ :Y( )6=Y ( )} (E) = 0,weseethatforanyB G, BXdP= BY dP= B EY dP+ B\EY dP= B\EY dP= B\EY dP= B\EY dP+ B EY dP= BY dP.

7 , ,andProp ectationisuniqueasanelementofL1( ,G,P).JustaselementsofLpspacesarereallye quivalenceclassesoffunctions(ratherthans p eci cfunctions)inclassicalanalysis,condition alexp eci almostsure quali cationwhensp eakingofrelationsb etweenconditionalexp ecta-tions,butitisimp ,wecanoftenworkwithconvenientversionsofE [X|G]whenweneedtomakeuseofp ,sub- -algebrasrepresent(p otentiallyavailable)information-foreachA GwecanaskwhetherornotAhaso ersp ective,wecanthinkofE[X|G]asgivingthe b estguess G,thenourheuristicsuggeststhatE[X|G] =XsinceifweknowX,thenourb esthede nitionasXalwayssatis escondition(ii)andcondition(i)

8 Ecttoany -algebra,takingX=cshowsthatE[c|G] = ,supp osethatXisindep endentofG-thatis,forallA G,B B,{X B}andAareindep ,Gtellsusnothingab outX,soourb estguessisE[X].Asaconstant,E[X]automatic allysatis escondition(i).Toseethat(ii)holdsaswell, notethatforanyA G, AE[X]dP=E[X]P(A) =E[X]E[1A] =E[X1A] = AXdPbyindep ,ordinaryexp ectationcorresp ondstoconditionalexp { , }. onourintro ductoryexample:Supp osethat 1, 2,..isacountablepartitionof intodisjointmeasurablesets,eachhavingp ositiveprobability( ).LetG= ( 1, 2,..).WeclaimthatE[X|G] =P( i) 1E[X; i]on icontainstheoutcome,andgiventhatinformat ion,ourb estguessforXisitsaverageover ,notethatE[X|G]( ) = iE[X; i]P( i)1 i( )isG-measurablesinceeach ib ,sinceeachA Gisacountabledisjointunionofthe is,itsu cestocheckcondition(ii) iP( i) 1E[X; i]dP=E[X; i] = nitionP(A|H) =E[1A|H],thentheab ovesaysthatP(A|G) =P( i) 1 i1 AdP=P(A i)P( i)on eseenasasp ecialcaseofourde nitionbytakingE[X|Y] =E[X| (Y) ].

9 Toseehowthiscompareswiththede nitiongiveninundergraduateprobability,su pp osethatXandYarediscretewithjointpmfpX,Ya ndmarginalspX, (Y)isgeneratedbythecountablepartition{Y= y}y Range(Y),sothepreviousexampleshowsthatif E|X|< ,thenE[X|Y] =P(Y=y) 1E[X;{Y=y}] =1P(Y=y) xxP(X=x,Y=y)= xxpX,Y(x,y)pY(y)on{Y=y}. ,supp osethatXandYarejointlyabsolutelycontinuouswithjointdensityfX,YandmarginalsfX, oseforsimplicitythatfY(y)>0forally ,ifE|g(X)|< ,thenE[g(X)|Y] =h(Y)whereh(y) = g(x)fX,Y(x,y)fY(y) ob-DynkinlemmashowsthatE[g(X)|Y] (Y).Toseethatthesecondcriterionissatis edaswell,recallthateveryA (Y)isoftheformA={Y B}forsomeB {Y B}h(Y)dP= Bh(y)fY(y)dy= 1B(y)( g(x)fX,Y(x,y)fY(y)dx)fY(y)dy= g(x)1B(y)fX,Y(x,y)dxdy=E[g(X)1B(Y)] = {Y B}g(X) >0isactuallyunnecessarysincetheab ovepro ofonlyneedshtosatisfyh(y)fY(y) = g(x)fX,Y(x,y)dx,sohcantakeonanyvalueatth oseywithfY(y) = 0.

10 (SincefY(y) = fX,Y(x,y)dxandfX,Y 0,theright-handsideoftheab oveequationwillalsob e0atsuchy.) osethatXandYareindep endentand satis esE| (X,Y)|< .ThenE[ (X,Y)|X] =g(X)whereg(x) =E[ (x,Y)].Asinthepreviousexample,condition( i)issatis edbyDo ob-Dynkin,andcondition(ii)canb everi edbyletting and denotethedistributionsofXandY,resp ectively,andcomputing {X B}g(X)dP= Bg(x)d (x) = 1B(x)( (x,y)d (y))d (x)= 1B(x) (x,y)d( )(x,y) = 1B(X) (X,Y)dP= {X B} (X,Y) ertiesofordinaryexp ectationcarryovertoconditionalexp ectationastheyareultimatelyfactsab outintegrals:Prop (Linearity).E[aX+Y|G] =aE[X|G] +E[Y|G] ,andforanyA G A(aE[X|G] +E[Y|G])dP=a AE[X|G]dP+ AE[Y|G]dP=a AXdP+ AY dP= A(aX+Y)dP.


Related search queries