Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) - dtic.mil

1 Selected Acquisition Report (SAR). RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-290. Navy Multiband Terminal (NMT). As of FY 2017 President's Budget Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR). March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs 3. Program Information 5. Responsible Office 5. References 5. Mission and Description 6. Executive Summary 7. Threshold Breaches 8. Schedule 9. Performance 10. Track to Budget 15. Cost and Funding 16. Low Rate Initial Production 24. Foreign Military Sales 25. Nuclear Costs 25. Unit Cost 26. Cost Variance 29. Contracts 32. Deliveries and Expenditures 34. Operating and Support Cost 35. March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED 2. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs Acq O&M - Acquisition -Related Operations and Maintenance ACAT - Acquisition Category ADM - Acquisition Decision Memorandum APB - Acquisition Program Baseline APPN - Appropriation APUC - Average Procurement Unit Cost $B - Billions of Dollars BA - Budget Authority/Budget Activity Blk - Block BY - Base Year CAPE - Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation CARD - Cost Analysis Requirements Description CDD - Capability Development Document CLIN - Contract Line Item Number CPD - Capability Production Document CY - Calendar Year DAB - Defense Acquisition Board DAE - Defense Acquisition Executive DAMIR - Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval DoD - Department of Defense DSN - Defense Switched Network EMD - Engineering and Manufacturing Development EVM - Earned Value Management FOC - Full Operational Capability FMS - Foreign Military Sales FRP - Full Rate Production FY - Fiscal Year FYDP - Future

2 Years Defense Program ICE - Independent Cost Estimate IOC - Initial Operational Capability Inc - Increment JROC - Joint Requirements Oversight Council $K - Thousands of Dollars KPP - Key Performance Parameter LRIP - Low Rate Initial Production $M - Millions of Dollars MDA - Milestone Decision Authority MDAP - Major Defense Acquisition Program MILCON - Military Construction N/A - Not Applicable O&M - Operations and Maintenance ORD - Operational Requirements Document OSD - Office of the Secretary of Defense O&S - Operating and Support PAUC - Program Acquisition Unit Cost March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED 3. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. PB - President's Budget PE - Program Element PEO - Program Executive Officer PM - Program Manager POE - Program Office Estimate RDT&E - Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation SAR - Selected Acquisition Report SCP - Service Cost Position TBD - To Be Determined TY - Then Year UCR - Unit Cost Reporting - United States USD(AT&L) - Under Secretary of Defense ( Acquisition , Technology and Logistics).

3 March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED 4. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. Program Information Program Name Navy Multiband Terminal (NMT). DoD Component Navy Responsible Office CAPT Mark Glover Phone: 619-524-7930. 4301 Pacific Coast Highway Fax: 619-524-3501. San Diego, CA 92110-3127. DSN Phone: 524-7930. DSN Fax: Date Assigned: September 10, 2013. References SAR Baseline (Production Estimate). Navy Acquisition Executive (NAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated October 4, 2010. Approved APB. Navy Acquisition Executive (NAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 11, 2016. March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED 5. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. Mission and Description The Navy Multiband Terminal (NMT) Program is the next generation maritime military satellite communications terminal. The NMT Program is the required Navy component to the Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) Program for enhancing protected and survivable satellite communications for Naval forces.

4 NMT multiband capabilities will communicate via two way Ka-Band on Wideband Global Satellite Communication (SATCOM) (WGS) and via X-Band on the Defense Satellite Communications System and WGS. NMT will operate in the Extremely High Frequency (EHF)/AEHF Low Data Rate, Medium Data Rate, and Extended Data Rate communication modes. NMT will sustain the Military SATCOM. architecture by providing connectivity across the spectrum of mission areas to include land, air, and naval warfare, special operations, strategic nuclear operations, strategic defense, theater missile defense, and space operations and intelligence. The NMT system will replenish and improve on the capabilities of both the MILSTAR system and WGS system by equipping the warfighters with the assured, jam resistant, secure communications as described in the ORD for the joint AEHF. Satellite Communications (AFSPC ORD 004-99, October 2000) and WGS System (Wideband Gapfiller System ORD, May 3, 2000), and the NMT CPD (NMT CPD 769-6F-08, November 18, 2008).

5 The AEHF system will provide crosslinks within the constellation as well as between AEHF satellites and MILSTAR satellites in the backwards-compatible mode. Mission requirements specific to Navy operations, including threat levels and scenarios, are contained in the AEHF ORD. NMT will be a FORCEnet enabler by providing critical protected bandwidth for warfighter information services. March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED 6. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. Executive Summary NMT held a successful Gate 6/Configuration Steering Board (CSB) review on November 30, 2015. The purpose of the review was to add the Wideband Anti-Jam Modem System (WAMS) capability to the NMT program baseline in support of Anti-Access/Area Denial initiatives. The Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition (ASN. (RDA)) approved WAMS pre- Acquisition activities and the program has initiated these efforts in the first quarter of FY 2016. In support of the Gate 6/CSB and updated APB, the program office worked with the Naval Center for Cost Analysis to develop a revised Component Cost Position (CCP).

6 The CCP was approved on December 18, 2015. The updated APB, which was signed on March 11, 2016, adds Adaptive Coding (AC) and WAMS to the program baseline. AC was approved by ASN (RDA) at the June 2014 CSB and provides the Fleet with optimized communication throughput in dynamic environments. On December 29, 2015, NMT awarded the Follow-On Full Deployment production contract to Raytheon. The contract, valued at $466M, will allow the program office to procure remaining terminals to meet the inventory objective and will support NMT procurements for Other Customer Funded (OCF) requirements. At the time of the award, the program exercised the Production Year 6 option for a buy of 12 NMT program of record terminals and 21 OCF terminals. As of December 30, 2015, NMT has fielded 101 of the 250 terminals in the current inventory objective. NMT continues to prepare for a Follow-on Operational Test and Evaluation, scheduled for the third quarter of FY 2016. There are no significant software-related issues with this program at this time.

7 March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED 7. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. Threshold Breaches APB Breaches Schedule Performance Cost RDT&E. Procurement MILCON. Acq O&M. O&S Cost Unit Cost PAUC. APUC. Nunn-McCurdy Breaches Current UCR Baseline PAUC None APUC None Original UCR Baseline PAUC None APUC None March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED 8. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. Schedule Schedule Events SAR Baseline Current APB. Current Events Production Production Estimate Estimate Objective/Threshold Milestone B Oct 2003 Oct 2003 Oct 2003 Oct 2003. System Development & Demonstration Contract Award Oct 2003 Oct 2003 Oct 2003 Oct 2003. Critical Design Review May 2005 May 2005 May 2005 May 2005. Operational Assessment Sep 2009 Mar 2010 Mar 2010 Mar 2010. Milestone C Feb 2010 Aug 2010 Aug 2010 Aug 2010. Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (Start) Apr 2012 Jul 2011 Jul 2011 Jul 2011. Full Rate Production Decision Review Sep 2012 Nov 2012 Nov 2012 Nov 2012. IOC Sep 2012 Dec 2012 Dec 2012 Dec 2012.

8 Change Explanations None March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED 9. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. Performance Performance Characteristics SAR Baseline Current APB. Demonstrated Current Production Production Performance Estimate Estimate Objective/Threshold NMT Antenna Control Coverage The NMT shall be The NMT shall be The NMT shall be Demonstrat-ed The NMT shall be capable of pointing capable of pointing capable of pointing capability to acquire capable of pointing and tracking and tracking and tracking and track Milstar, and tracking satellites with satellites with satellites with WGS, and DSCS satellites with elevation angles of 0 elevation angles of 0 elevation angles of satellites. elevation angles of 0. deg (20 deg for the deg (20 deg for the 10 deg (20 deg for deg (20 deg for the mast) above the mast) above the the mast) above the mast) above the horizon and 360 deg horizon and 360 deg horizon and 360 deg horizon and 360 deg in azimuth with full in azimuth with full in azimuth with full in azimuth with full platform dynamics.

9 Platform dynamics. platform dynamics. platform dynamics. In the absence of In the absence of In the absence of sea state or sea state or sea state or submarine submarine submarine dynamics, the dynamics, the dynamics, the antenna shall have antenna shall have antenna shall have the capability to point the capability to point the capability to point at satellites down to at satellites down to at satellites down to 0 deg relative to the 0 deg relative to the 0 deg relative to the horizon. horizon. horizon. Sustainment Materiel Availability (Ch-1). >= >= >= Ship: , Sub: , >= Shore: Operational Availability (Ao). (Ch-1). > (sub) > > (sub) > > (sub) > Ship: , Sub: , > (sub) > (ship/shore) (ship/shore) (ship/shore) Shore: (ship/shore). Reliability Materiel Reliability Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF). (Ch-1). >= 2200 hrs >= 2200 hrs >= 1100 hrs Ship: 14,211 hrs, >= 2200 hrs Sub: 9,275 hrs, Shore: >= 2,200 hrs Materiel Reliability - Mean Time Between Critical Failure (MTBCF).

10 (Ch-1). >= 4200 hrs >= 4200 hrs >= 1400 hrs Ship: 14,211 hrs, >= 4200 hrs Sub: 9,275 hrs, Shore: >= 4,200 hrs Maintainability Mean Time to Repair (MTTR). <= 1 hr <= 1 hr <= 3 hrs Ship: hrs <= 1 hr March 23, 2016. UNCLASSIFIED 10. 15:26:58. NMT December 2015 SAR. (10/15/2012) Shore: hrs (11/14/2011). Sub: hrs (11/14/2011). Cost Ownership Cost (Ch-2). <= $298M <= $253M <= $278M $ <= $328M. Survivability Survive an EMP (AEHF Only). NMT AEHF/EHF NMT AEHF/EHF NMT AEHF/EHF TBD NMT AEHF/EHF. functionality shall be functionality shall be functionality shall be functionality shall be capable of surviving capable of surviving capable of surviving capable of surviving indirect nuclear indirect nuclear indirect nuclear indirect nuclear detonation EMP and detonation EMP and detonation EMP and detonation EMP and thermal blast effects thermal blast effects thermal blast effects thermal blast effects as defined in ELEX- as defined in ELEX- as defined in ELEX- as defined in ELEX- S-488G and SR- S-488G and SR- S-488G and SR- S-488G and SR- 3000 Appendix 3000 Appendix 3000 Appendix 3000 Appendix NMT Multiband Terminal Operations NMT shall provide NMT shall provide NMT shall provide TBD NMT shall provide AEHF/EHF capability AEHF/EHF capability AEHF/EHF capability AEHF/EHF capability with two-way military with two-way military with two-way military with two-way military Ka-band (ship only), Ka-band (ship only), Ka-band (ship only), Ka-band (ship only)