Example: stock market
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
13 And even if the Court finds some 14 ambiguity in that with respect to the statute, 15 we think this is a case very much like MCI or 16 very much like the Iowa Utilities Board case, 17 which is cited at page 16 of the Chamber brief, 18 in which whatever ambiguity and, therefore,
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov4 . v. HODGES OBERGEFELL Syllabus . Finally, this Court’s cases and the Nation’s traditions make clear that marriage is a keystone of the Nation’s social order.
(ORDER LIST: 585 U.S.) MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2018 …
www.supremecourt.govThe judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the ; United States District Court for the Middle District of North : Carolina for further consideration in light of Gill v.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govcite as: 583 u. s. ____ (2017) 1 breyer, j., dissenting supreme court of the united states nos. 16–9448 and 17–5083 quentin marcus truehill 16–9448 v. florida . on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. GREENE’S ENERGY GROUP, LLC Syllabus . 1. Inter partes review does not violate Article III. Pp. 5–17. (a) Under this Court’s precedents, Congress has significant lati-
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 FLORIDA v.GEORGIA Syllabus . sets of principles guide the Court’s review. First, both Georgia and Florida possess “an equal right to make a reasonable use of the wa ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedoms asserted here are both the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 585 U. S. ____ (2018) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the …
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedoms asserted here are both the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N Syllabus and cable television. Concerned about possible civil and criminal penalties for violating §441b, it sought declaratory and injunctive re-
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 . v. UNITED STATES CARPENTER Syllabus . prepared to recognize as reasonable,” official intrusion into that sphere generally qualifies as a search and requires a warrant sup
Related documents
Iowa Court Forms and Instructions for an Application.
www.legis.iowa.govApproved by the Iowa Supreme Court and State Court Administrator, Des Moines, IA ¾ You may use the forms in this packet if: • You want to start a court case to modify child support only, • There is a current child support order from an Iowa court that says how much you pay or receive for child support – and –
10 Supreme Court Cases Every Teen Should Know
www.isd622.org10 Supreme Court Cases Every Teen Should Know The nation's highest court has had plenty to say about everything from free speech at school to teenagers' rights in the legal system. By Tom Jacobs For those of us on the outside, the U.S. Supreme Court can seem remote and mysterious. But the Court,
I T Supreme Court of the United States
www.supremecourt.govDistrict Court for the Southern District of Iowa. Denial of motion to compel arbitration entered June 28, 2019. Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., No. 19-2435, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Judgment entered March 30, 2021.
IOWA COURT RULES
www.legis.iowa.govThe Fourth Edition of the Iowa Court Rules, adopted by the supreme court November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002, is published pursuant to Iowa Code section 2B.5(2). Supplements to the loose-leaf compilation will be prepared and distributed as the rules are amended by the court. The date at the top of each
ROE v. WADE
tile.loc.govcross-appealed from the District Court's grant of declaratory relief to Roe and Hailford. Held: 1. While 28 U. S. C. § 1253 authorizes no direct appeal to this Court from the grant or denial of declaratory relief alone, review is not foreclosed when the case is properly before the Court on
Paralegal Regulation by State
www.paralegals.orgAug 24, 2017 · 2003: Supreme Court of Arizona adopted § 7-208 of the Arizona Code of Judicial Administration regarding "Legal Document Preparers" effective July 1, 2003. This code requires anyone preparing legal paperwork without an attorney’s supervision must be certified as a legal document preparer. Legal document preparers can provide