Example: barber
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
The Dem ocratic National Committee and certain affiliates filed suit, alleging that both the State’s refusal to count ballots cast in the wrong precinct and its ballot -collection restriction had an adverse and dispar-ate effect on the State’s America n Indian, Hispanic, and African -Amer-ican citizens in violation of §2 of the VRA.
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov4 . v. HODGES OBERGEFELL Syllabus . Finally, this Court’s cases and the Nation’s traditions make clear that marriage is a keystone of the Nation’s social order.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. GREENE’S ENERGY GROUP, LLC Syllabus . 1. Inter partes review does not violate Article III. Pp. 5–17. (a) Under this Court’s precedents, Congress has significant lati-
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedoms asserted here are both the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govcite as: 583 u. s. ____ (2017) 1 breyer, j., dissenting supreme court of the united states nos. 16–9448 and 17–5083 quentin marcus truehill 16–9448 v. florida . on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 585 U. S. ____ (2018) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the …
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. The freedoms asserted here are both the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N Syllabus and cable television. Concerned about possible civil and criminal penalties for violating §441b, it sought declaratory and injunctive re-
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 . v. UNITED STATES CARPENTER Syllabus . prepared to recognize as reasonable,” official intrusion into that sphere generally qualifies as a search and requires a warrant sup
(ORDER LIST: 585 U.S.) MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2018 …
www.supremecourt.govThe judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the ; United States District Court for the Middle District of North : Carolina for further consideration in light of Gill v.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.gov2 FLORIDA v.GEORGIA Syllabus . sets of principles guide the Court’s review. First, both Georgia and Florida possess “an equal right to make a reasonable use of the wa ...
Related documents
In the Supreme Court of the United States
electionlawblog.orgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania—which has a 5-2 Dem-ocratic majority—imposed a more partisan Democratic map backed by the Elias Law Group, overruling the rec-ommendation of its special master that had urged the adoption of the legislature’s plan. The question presented is: Do the Elections Clause and 2 U.S.C. § 2a(c)
P˚˛˝ ˆˇ˘ Tˇ S ˚ ˘ ˆˇ˘ S ˘˛ˆˆ, D ˘˚ Pˇ ˘ , ˘ ˚ ˘ ˘. The Knoxville OCUS
www.knoxfocus.comnod. There are three Dem-ocratic challengers, Bob Fisher, Tyler Givens and Debbie Hensley, hoping to be chosen to oppose Jacobs in August. But most of the atten-tion in early voting seems to be spurred by the Republican races and par-ticularly the race for Knox County Sheriff. Given no Democratic opponent which ever candidates
A BRIEF HISTORY OF LA RAZA UNIDA PARTY
library.ucsd.eduThe Dem-ocratic Party has a long history of broken promises that it now tries to, cover by token appointees. The Republican Party is blatantly racist, yet attempts to convince us of their concern. 2 . This does not mean that we can not or should not work with or-
media.tehrantimes.com
media.tehrantimes.comtias is necessary to retain the peoples’ dem-ocratic rights and prevent the emergence of a dictatorship. Others see having guns necessary for self-defense,” Hunter tells the Tehran Times. Pointing to the Second Amendment of the . U.S. Constitution that guarantees the right to bear arms, Hunter emphasizes that “in-
STEVEN LEVITSKY & DANIEL ZIBLATT - European University …
www.eui.eutanks in the streets. Constitutions and other nominally dem-ocratic institutions remain in place. People still vote. Elected autocrats maintain a veneer of democracy while eviscerating its substance. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are "legal," in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or ac-