Example: marketing

The Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse

The Snowflake Elastic Data WarehouseBenoit Dageville, Thierry Cruanes, Marcin Zukowski, Vadim Antonov, Artin Avanes,Jon Bock, Jonathan Claybaugh, Daniel Engovatov, Martin Hentschel,Jiansheng Huang, Allison W. Lee, Ashish Motivala, Abdul Q. Munir, Steven Pelley,Peter Povinec, Greg Rahn, Spyridon Triantafyllis, Philipp UnterbrunnerSnowflake ComputingABSTRACTWe live in the golden age of distributed computing. Pub-lic cloud platforms now offer virtually unlimited computeand storage resources on demand. At the same time, theSoftware-as-a-Service (SaaS) model brings enterprise-classsystems to users who previously could not afford such sys-tems due to their cost and complexity.

May 01, 2015 · SQL extensions for traversing, attening, and nest-ing of semi-structured data, with support for popular ... width, light compute) is a poor t for complex queries (low I/O bandwidth, heavy compute) and vice versa. Consequently, the hardware con guration needs to be ... more frequent and performance can vary dramatically, even among nodes of the ...

Tags:

  More, Queries, Complex, Complex queries

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of The Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse

1 The Snowflake Elastic Data WarehouseBenoit Dageville, Thierry Cruanes, Marcin Zukowski, Vadim Antonov, Artin Avanes,Jon Bock, Jonathan Claybaugh, Daniel Engovatov, Martin Hentschel,Jiansheng Huang, Allison W. Lee, Ashish Motivala, Abdul Q. Munir, Steven Pelley,Peter Povinec, Greg Rahn, Spyridon Triantafyllis, Philipp UnterbrunnerSnowflake ComputingABSTRACTWe live in the golden age of distributed computing. Pub-lic cloud platforms now offer virtually unlimited computeand storage resources on demand. At the same time, theSoftware-as-a-Service (SaaS) model brings enterprise-classsystems to users who previously could not afford such sys-tems due to their cost and complexity.

2 Alas, traditionaldata warehousing systems are struggling to fit into this newenvironment. For one thing, they have been designed forfixed resources and are thus unable to leverage the cloud selasticity. For another thing, their dependence on complexETL pipelines and physical tuning is at odds with the flex-ibility and freshness requirements of the cloud s new typesof semi-structured data and rapidly evolving decided a fundamental redesign was in order. Ourmission was to build an enterprise-ready data warehousingsolution for the cloud.

3 The result is the Snowflake ElasticData Warehouse , or Snowflake for short. Snowflake is amulti-tenant, transactional, secure, highly scalable and elas-tic system with full SQL support and built-in extensions forsemi-structured and schema-less data. The system is offeredas a pay-as-you-go service in the Amazon cloud. Users up-load their data to the cloud and can immediately manageand query it using familiar tools and interfaces. Implemen-tation began in late 2012 and Snowflake has been generallyavailable since June 2015. Today, Snowflake is used in pro-duction by a growing number of small and large organiza-tions alike.

4 The system runs several million queries per dayover multiple petabytes of this paper, we describe the design of Snowflake andits novel multi-cluster, shared-data architecture. The paperhighlights some of the key features of Snowflake: extremeelasticity and availability, semi-structured and schema-lessdata, time travel, and end-to-end security. It concludes withlessons learned and an outlook on ongoing and Subject DescriptorsInformation systems [Data management systems]: Data-base management system enginesPermission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal orclassroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributedfor profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citationon the first page.

5 Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).SIGMOD/PODS 16 June 26 - July 01, 2016, San Francisco, CA, USAc 2016 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-3531-7/16 : warehousing, database as a service, multi-cluster shareddata architecture1. INTRODUCTIONThe advent of the cloud marks a move away from softwaredelivery and execution on local servers, and toward shareddata centers and software-as-a-service solutions hosted byplatform providers such as Amazon, Google, or shared infrastructure of the cloud promises increasedeconomies of scale, extreme scalability and availability, anda pay-as-you-go cost model that adapts to unpredictable us-age demands.

6 But these advantages can only be capturedif thesoftwareitself is able to scale elastically over the poolof commodity resources that is the cloud. Traditional datawarehousing solutions pre-date the cloud. They were de-signed to run on small, static clusters of well-behaved ma-chines, making them a poor architectural not only the platform has changed. Data has changedas well. It used to be the case that most of the data in adata Warehouse came from sources within the organization:transactional systems, enterprise resource planning (ERP)applications, customer relationship management (CRM) ap-plications, and the like.

7 The structure, volume, and rate ofthe data were all fairly predictable and well known. Butwith the cloud, a significant and rapidly growing share ofdata comes from less controllable or external sources: ap-plication logs, web applications, mobile devices, social me-dia, sensor data (Internet of Things). In addition to thegrowing volume, this data frequently arrives in schema-less,semi-structured formats [3]. Traditional data warehousingsolutions are struggling with this new data. These solu-tions depend on deep ETL pipelines and physical tuningthat fundamentally assume predictable, slow-moving, andeasily categorized data from largely internal response to these shortcomings, parts of the data ware-housing community have turned to Big Data platformssuch as Hadoop or Spark [8, 11].

8 While these are indis-pensable tools for data center-scale processing tasks, and theopen source community continues to make big improvementssuch as the Stinger Initiative [48], they still lack much of theefficiency and feature set of established data warehousingtechnology. But most importantly, they require significantengineering effort to roll out and use [16].We believe that there is a large class of use cases andworkloads which can benefit from the economics, elasticity,and service aspects of the cloud, but which are not wellserved by either traditional data warehousing technology or215by Big Data platforms.

9 So we decided to build a completelynew data warehousing system specifically for the cloud. Thesystem is called the Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse , or Snowflake . In contrast to many other systems in the clouddata management space, Snowflake is not based on Hadoop,PostgreSQL or the like. The processing engine and most ofthe other parts have been developed from key features of Snowflake are as Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) ExperienceUsersneed not buy machines, hire database administrators,or install software. Users either already have their datain the cloud, or they upload (or mail [14]) it.

10 They canthen immediately manipulate and query their data us-ing Snowflake s graphical interface or standardized in-terfaces such as ODBC. In contrast to other Database-as-a-Service (DBaaS) offerings, Snowflake s service as-pect extends to the whole user experience. There areno tuning knobs, no physical design, no storage groom-ing tasks on the part of has comprehensive support for ANSISQL and ACID transactions. Most users are able tomigrate existing workloads with little to no offers built-in functions andSQL extensions for traversing, flattening, and nest-ing of semi-structured data, with support for popularformats such as JSON and Avro.


Related search queries