Example: barber

Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Scale

Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Scale Assessment Overview Assessment Area Summary ICF Domain: The Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Scale is a clinician-administered and rated Body Function Scale used to assess the risk for Pressure Ulcer (PU) development. It Subcategory: provides better sensitivity and specificity than the Norton Scale . Functions of the Skin You Will Need 5-10 minutes to complete 8 items Equipment: None, but Manual is recommended Availability Download here: Available in: English Assessment Interpretability Minimal Clinically Important Statistical Error Typical Values Difference Not established in SCI Not established in SCI Mean scores: All patients: Patients with PU: Patients with no PU: (Ash 2002; N=144) measurement Properties Validity Moderate Reliability Not established in SCI Moderate correlation with Norton Scale : Number of studies reporting reliability data: 0 Spearm

Measurement Properties ValidityModerate– Reliability Moderate correlation with Norton Scale: Spearman’s ρ = -0.50~-0.56 (P<0.001; Wellard, 2000; N=60, SCI

Tags:

  Measurement

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Transcription of Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Scale

1 Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Scale Assessment Overview Assessment Area Summary ICF Domain: The Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Scale is a clinician-administered and rated Body Function Scale used to assess the risk for Pressure Ulcer (PU) development. It Subcategory: provides better sensitivity and specificity than the Norton Scale . Functions of the Skin You Will Need 5-10 minutes to complete 8 items Equipment: None, but Manual is recommended Availability Download here: Available in: English Assessment Interpretability Minimal Clinically Important Statistical Error Typical Values Difference Not established in SCI Not established in SCI Mean scores: All patients: Patients with PU: Patients with no PU: (Ash 2002; N=144) measurement Properties Validity Moderate Reliability Not established in SCI Moderate correlation with Norton Scale : Number of studies reporting reliability data: 0 Spearman's = ~ (P<.)

2 Wellard, 2000; N=60, SCI individuals with 1+ PU diagnosis) ROC Analysis: Moderate Area under curve = (Ash, 2002; N=144) Number of studies reporting validity data: 2 Responsiveness Floor/Ceiling Effect: Effect Size: Number of studies reporting 36% of patients at very high risk Not established in SCI responsiveness data: 1 Very high risk defined as a score of 20+ (Wellard, 2000; N=60, SCI individuals with 1+ PU diagnosis; Waterlow 1985)


Related search queries