Transcription of CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: biology
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 164/13 In the matter between: DALUXOLO NICHOLAS SALI Applicant and NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE First Respondent PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE Second Respondent MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY Third Respondent Neutral citation: Sali v National Commissioner of the SOUTH African Police Service and Others [2014] ZACC 19 Coram: Moseneke ACJ, Skweyiya ADCJ, Cameron J, Dambuza AJ, Froneman J, Jafta J, Khampepe J, Madlanga J, Majiedt AJ, Van der Westhuizen J and Zondo J Heard on: 10 March 2014 Decided on: 19 June 2014 Summary: Section 9 of the Constitution unfair discrimination age discrimination SOUTH Afri
dismissed. Both the Labour Court and the Labour Appeal Court refused him leave to appeal. He contended that it was not necessary for him to approach the Supreme Court of Appeal before coming to this Court because, as from 23 August 2013, the Supreme Court of Appeal no longer has the competence to decide appeals from the Labour Courts.
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: