Transcription of DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: confidence
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIESF orschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der ArbeitInstitute for the Study of Labor The Choice Between Fixed and Random Effects Models: Some Considerations for Educational ResearchIZA DP No. 5287 October 2010 Paul ClarkeClaire CrawfordFiona SteeleAnna Vignoles The Choice Between Fixed and Random Effects Models: Some Considerations for Educational Research Paul Clarke CMPO, University of Bristol Claire Crawford IFS and IoE, University of London Fiona Steele CMM, University of Bristol Anna Vignoles IoE, University of London and IZA DISCUSSION PAPER No. 5287 October 2010 IZA Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA.
example, are more likely to focus on the impact of personal and family characteristics on achievement (Todd and Wolpin, 2003), and hence tend to use fixed effect models. 3 In contrast, an important focus for education researchers is on the role of schools (Townsend, 2007), which
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
Related search queries
Econometric Impact Evaluation and Economic Development, Using impact evaluation, STATA, Impact Evaluation, Using, Impact, The Fletcher School, Tufts University, SCORE MATCHING IN THE, SCORE MATCHING IN THE EVALUATION OF ACTIVE LABOUR MARKET, Evaluation, SIEF Kenya Impact Evaluation Workshop Di erence, Regression Discontinuity World Bank SIEF, Regression Discontinuity World Bank SIEF / APHRC Impact Evaluation Training, Propensity Score Matching, IMPACT EVALUATION IN AGRICULTURE, Empirical methods, Massachusetts Institute of Technology