Transcription of eLearning Theories & Models - Virginia Tech
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Theories & Models Used for eLearning In 2003, Van Buren and Sloman suggested that 62 percent of all learning technology initiatives fail to meet expectations. Discouraging figures like that should prompt eLearning leaders to concern themselves with measures to ensure a successful eLearning program. In one of your readings for this lesson, Driscoll and Carliner (2005) warn that eLearning failures are often due to the fact that designing e- learning is different than designing classroom and workbook-based learning (p. 13), and this fact is often overlooked by those initiating eLearning efforts. Driscoll and Carliner caution against trying to devise a universal solution for eLearning design, since there are many factors that approach one takes, including the subject content, project budgets, schedules and the purpose of the course. They recommend concentrating on the specific problem that must be solved or content to be presented to guide design efforts.
Your readings for this lesson highlight those major categories of learning theory – Behaviorism, Cognitivism, and Constructivism (Driscoll & Carliner and Ertmer and
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Constructivist teaching methods, Teacher education, Learning theory, Learning: Theory and Research, Learning: Theory and Research Learning theory and research, EDUCATION, Social Constructivism, Social Constructivism Social constructivism, Learning, 114 Constructivism in Education, Constructivism in Education, Technology Integration and Learning Theory, Constructivism, Teacher, SYLLABI FOR BACHELOR OF EDUCATION, 17 EXAMINATIONS OUTLINES FOR EVALUATION