Transcription of Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Review of Educational ResearchlSpring 2001, VoL 71, No. 1, pp. 1-27 Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation inEducation: Reconsidered Once AgainEdward L. DeciUniversity of RochesterRichard KoestnerMcGill UnivervitvRichard M. RyanUniversity, of RochesterThe finding that exlrinsic rewvards can undernine Intrinsic Motivation has beenhighly controveisial itfirstoppeared (Deci, 1971). A meta-analysis pub-lished in this journal (Cameron & Pierce 1994) conc:luded thlat tlhe under-iniing effect was minimal and largely inm onsequentiialfor educational , a more recent meta-analysis (D)eci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999)showed that the Cameron and Pie ce meta-analysis was seriousvh flawed andthat its conclusions i-ere incorrect. This article briefly r eviews the results ofthe more recent meta-analysis, which showed that tangible Rewards do indeedhave a substantial undermining effrct. The meta-analysis provided strongsupportfor cognitive evaluation theorv (Deci & Ryan, 1980), vhich Carneronand Pierce had advocated abandoning.
Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation because it has guided much of the research in the field. This is followed by a sum-mary of the methods and results of our meta-analysis and, finally, a discussion of
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}