Example: bankruptcy
“Structural vs. Reduced Form”

“Structural vs. Reduced Form”

Back to document page

quality, and ϵ is a cost shock (unobserved shifter of costs) •demand D (p,t, η), where p is price, η is a demand shock •taking (t, ϵ, η) as given, solve for eqm price and quantity: p∗(t, ϵ, η) q∗(t, ϵ, η) = D (p∗(t, ϵ, η),t, η) The theorist’s reduced forms are p∗(t, ϵ, η) and q∗(t, ϵ, η).

  Cost, Reduced

Download “Structural vs. Reduced Form”


Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Related search queries