Example: dental hygienist

Microeconomic Theory -1- Consumers - UCLA Econ

microeconomics -1 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 A1. The simple mathematics of elasticity 2 A2. The Envelope Theorem 7 B. Income and substitution effects 15 C. Application: Labor supply 24 D. Determinants of demand 28 E. Measuring consumer gains and losses 38 Technical Notes* 46 1. Equivalent Variation 2. Mathematics of income and substitution effects 3.

Microeconomic Theory-3- Consumers © John Riley October 11, 2016

Tags:

  Consumer, Theory, Microeconomics, Microeconomic theory, Microeconomic theory 1 consumers

Information

Domain:

Source:

Link to this page:

Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:

Other abuse

Advertisement

Transcription of Microeconomic Theory -1- Consumers - UCLA Econ

1 microeconomics -1 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 A1. The simple mathematics of elasticity 2 A2. The Envelope Theorem 7 B. Income and substitution effects 15 C. Application: Labor supply 24 D. Determinants of demand 28 E. Measuring consumer gains and losses 38 Technical Notes* 46 1. Equivalent Variation 2. Mathematics of income and substitution effects 3.

2 Superlevel sets of the aggregated utility function 58 slides *Not examinable. Will be omitted from the lectures. microeconomics -2 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 A1. Elasticity Consider the figure opposite. A very useful measure of the sensitivity of y with respect to z is the proportional rate of change of y with respect to z . This is called the arc elasticity Arc elasticity = yzyyzyzz * Arc elasticity microeconomics -3 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 A1.

3 Elasticity Consider the figure opposite. A very useful measure of the sensitivity of y with respect to z is the proportional rate of change of y with respect to z . This is called the arc elasticity Arc elasticity = yzyyzyzz Consider two countries that measure both y and z in different units. Y ay and Z bz . Then Y a y and Z b z It follows that the arc elasticity is the same. ( ) ()( ) ()Z Ybz a yz yY Zay b zy z Arc elasticity microeconomics -4 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 (Point) Elasticity In theoretical analysis it is helpful to take the limit and define the (point) elasticity Elasticity =( , ) limz y z dyyzy zy dz ()()

4 Zf zfz * Point elasticity microeconomics -5 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 (Point) Elasticity In theoretical analysis it is helpful to take the limit and define the (point) elasticity Elasticity =( , ) limz y z dyyzy zy dz ()()zf zfz Note that 1lnddyydzy dz . Therefore ( , )lnz dydy zzyy dzdz . Using this formula we can derive the following proposition Elasticity of products and ratios The elasticity of a product is the sum of the elasticities.

5 ( , )( , )( , )xy zx zy z The elasticity of a ratio is the difference in elasticities ( , )( , )( , )xzx zy zy Point elasticity microeconomics -6 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 Derivation of the sum rule ( , )lnz dydy zzyy dzdz Consider the elasticity of a product. ( , )lndxy zzxydz [lnln ]dzxydz lnlnddzxydzdz ( , )( , )x zy z Group exercises: Group O: Linear demand ,app a bq qb Group E: Log linear demand , lnlnlnbq apqa b p microeconomics -7 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 A2.

6 The Envelope Theorem Consider the following constrained maximization problem with a parameter p in the function to be maximized. Let x be the solution when the parameter is p . Let ()xp be the solution for all p . Let ()Fp be the maximized value. ( ){ ( , ) | ( )}xF pMax f x p g x b . Simple Example: Profit maximization ( ){( )}qF pMax pq C q To determine the rate at which ( )( ( ), )F pf x p p varies with p is appears that it is necessary to first solve for the maximizer ()xp and then substitute this into ( , )f x p. However this intuition is incorrect. The answer is much simpler. On the margin only the direct effect is a non-zero effect.

7 microeconomics -8 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 Envelope theorem 0( ){ ( , ) | ( )}xF pMax f x p g x b . ( ( ), )dFfx p pdpp Informal proof: Let ()x x p be the solution when the price is p . Suppose that the decision-maker is na ve and does not change output as the parameter changes. The na ve payoff is ( , )( ( ), )f x pf x p p . We compare ()Fp and ( , )f x p.

8 * microeconomics -9 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 Envelope theorem 0( ){ ( , ) | ( )}xF pMax f x p g x b . ( ( ), )dFfx p pdpp Informal proof: Let ()x x p be the solution when the price is p . Suppose that the decision-maker is na ve and does not change output as the parameter changes. The na ve payoff is ( , )( ( ), )f x pf x p p.

9 Note that (i) ( )( ( ), )F pf x p p Since ()xp is optimal, for all p (ii) ( )( ( ), )( ( ), )F pf x p pf x p p . Assuming that the functions are differentiable, the graphs of the two functions must be as depicted. It follows that the graphs must be tangential at p. ( )( , )fF px pp microeconomics -10 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 Intuition for the simplest case with no constraint ( ){ ( , )}xF pMax f x p There are two effects 1.

10 Direct effect Parameter change p ( , )f x p rises to ( ,)f x pp * microeconomics -11 - Consumers John Riley October 23, 2018 Intuition for the simplest case with no constraint ( ){ ( , )}xF pMax f x p There are two effects 1. Direct effect Parameter change p ( , )f x p rises to ( ,)f x pp 2. Indirect effect Decision variable change x . For small change in price the The graph of ( , )f x p has a slope which is close to zero.


Related search queries