Search results with tag "State v"
Accordingly, the court reverses the judgment of the ...
www.courts.state.co.usSee State v. Medved, 2019 CO . 7. 1, ¶ 13, 433 P.3d 33, 36 (noting that we review questions of law de novo). 8 ¶13. The common law rule provides that only the parents of an unemancipated . 9. minor child³and not the child³have the right to recover the childs pre-majority . 10. medical expenses. See, e.g., Pressey, ¶ 26, 488 P.3d at 159 ...
State v. Hunter - Supreme Court of Ohio
www.supremecourt.ohio.govSee State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259, 574 N.E.2d 492 (1991), paragraph two of the syllabus. It is a test of adequacy, and whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment is a question of law. Eastley v. ... State v. Hunter ...
State v. Turner - Supreme Court of Ohio
www.supremecourt.ohio.gov[cite as state v. turner, 2015-ohio-996.] state of ohio ) in the court of appeals )ss: ninth judicial district county of summit ) state of ohio appellee v. marcus turner appellant c.a. no. 27532 appeal from judgment entered in the court of common pleas county of summit, ohio …
State vs. Federal Citizenship - Truth Sets Us Free home page
www.truthsetsusfree.comState vs. Federal Citizenship By Moses G. Washington revised on 6/1/2003 Disclaimer The material in this essay is for educational purposes only and not to be construed as …
State v. Gabriel
www.sconet.state.oh.us3 Gabriel would lead officers to Erica’s body. The surveillance was unsuccessful because the officers were spotted on several occasions, and the surveillance ceased after six sporadic days.
State v. Raphael - Supreme Court of Ohio
www.supremecourt.ohio.gov[Cite as State v.Raphael, 2018-Ohio-140.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO.
State v. Raphael - Supreme Court of Ohio
www.supremecourt.ohio.gov[cite as state v. raphael, 2015-ohio-3179.] in the court of appeals twelfth appellate district of ohio warren county state of ohio, : case nos. ca2014-11-138
State v. Aquila - supremecourt.ohio.gov
www.supremecourt.ohio.govAquila has failed to demonstrate that the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea was an abuse of discretion. {¶13} Aquila maintains that the trial court’s opposition to his receiving parole
State v. Cody
www.supremecourt.ohio.govconcerning Cody’s contact with him while the charges were pending. The judge denied a Crim.R. 29 motion at the close of the State’s case and Cody presented six witnesses in defense.
State v. Neal - Supreme Court of Ohio
www.supremecourt.ohio.govCody’s shoes in a trash pile behind the residence. The shoes had not been found during previous searches of the residence, including canine searches on July 9-11, 1997. Appellant identified the shoes as the shoes he had put on Cody the morning of July 9, 1997.
State v. Miles - Supreme Court of Ohio
www.supremecourt.ohio.gov3 rescheduled for July 9, but on that day, Mr. Miles moved for a continuance to obtain new counsel. The trial court granted his motion. On July 24, the parties mutually agreed to schedule
State v. Beagle - Supreme Court of Ohio
www.supremecourt.ohio.govthe trial court also found that Beagle was a sexually violent predator as specified in the rape counts. (Feb. 6, 2017 Sentencing Tr. at 7-8, filed May 19, 2017.)
State v. Turner - Supreme Court of Ohio
www.supremecourt.ohio.govTurner was thereafter transported to jail and charged with possession of heroin and cocaine. {¶ 8} On December 7, 2015, Turner was indicted for one count of possession of heroin and one count of possession of cocaine. At his arraignment on December 15, 2015, Turner stood mute, and the trial court entered a plea of not guilty on his behalf.
State v. Martin - Supreme Court of Ohio
www.supremecourt.ohio.govMartin, withdrew after citing scheduling conflicts and disagreements with his client about strategy and motions to be filed in pursuit of the defense of the charges.