Transcription of Class I vs. Class II Cabling - IEEE 802
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
1 Class I vs. Class IIClass I vs. Class IICablingCablingAlan FlatmanAlan FlatmanPrincipal ConsultantPrincipal ConsultantLAN TechnologiesLAN TechnologiesEmail: Email: to IEEE Task Force; 16-18 July 2013, Geneva, I vs. Class II & connector costs for a 30m status& plansContribution to IEEE Task Force; 16-18 July 2013, Geneva, CH3 ISO/IEC TR 11801-99-140 GBASE-T Cabling Guidance speculative project approved March 2012 to support Next Gen. BASE-T initiatives underway within IEEE motivation to offer range of optionsrange of optionsfor 40 GBASE-T Technical Report route chosen to expedite processexpedite process PDTR had substantial support in 1stnational review 2ndPDTR circulated in April 2013 for approval as DTR ISO/IEC 11801-99-1 expected to be approved 1Q14 Contribution to IEEE Task Force; 16-18 July 2013, Geneva, CH4 ISO/IEC TR 11801-99-1 DeliverablesCat 6 ACat 7 APerformance Requirementsfor 30m, 2-connector ChannelLegacycomponentsLegacycomponentsL egacycomponents tohigher frequencyEnhancedcomponents tohigher frequencyEnhancedcomponents tohigher frequencyTutorial on Channel Capacity,Assumptions, other PHY-relatedLegacycomponents tohigher frequencyContribution to IEEE Task Force; 16-18 July 2013, Geneva, CH5 ISO/IEC TR 11801-99-1 Next G
2 Content 1. Class I vs. Class II performance 2. cable & connector construction 3. relative costs for a 30m channel 4. standardisation status & plans
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}