Transcription of GUIDELINES TO FOLLOW WHEN CONSIDERING THE MERITS …
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
GUIDELINES TO FOLLOW when CONSIDERING THE MERITS OF AN APPEAL IN A CASE OF MISCONDUCT 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..1 2. STEPS TO BE TAKEN BEFORE DELIBERATING ON THE MERITS OF AN 3. DELIBERATING ON THE MERITS OF AN APPEAL ..3 4. SUGGESTED FORMAT TO ASSIST THE APPEAL AUTHORITY TO TAKE A 5. REFERENCE TO LEGISLATION AND CASE LAW ..16 1. INTRODUCTION Appeals in cases of misconduct, have until 30 June 1999, been handled by the Public Service Commission in terms of section 26 of the Public Service Act, 1994. In terms of section 10 of the Public Service Laws Amendment Act, 1998, the whole of Chapter VI (Inefficiency and Misconduct) of the Public Service Act, 1994, has been repealed. This means that the provisions of sections 20 to 27 of the Public Service Act, 1994, have fallen away. A collective agreement on a new Disciplinary Code and Procedures for the Public Service as agreed upon in the Public Service Co-ordinating Bargaining Council, was reached and signed on 29 January 1999, and has come into effect on 1 July 1999.
Schedule 8 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, insofar as it relates to discipline constitutes a part of the Disciplinary Code and Procedures for the Public Service.
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
1 March 2015 to date, Labour, 1 March 2015 – to date, Labour Relations Act, 1995, LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, IN, LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, IN JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT, Labour Relations Act, 1995, Labour Court, Retrenchment, LABOUR RELATIONS ACT 66 OF 1995, Labour Relations, LABOUR RELATIONS ACT NO. 66, LABOUR RELATIONS AMENDMENT ACT 1995, Labour Relations Policy Framework for the, Relations Act, EMPLOYMENT ACT 1995 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS, EMPLOYMENT ACT 1995 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART