IMPROVING SECONDARY SCIENCE

Guidance ReportIMPROVING SECONDARY SCIENCE2 Education Endowment Foundation The authors would like to thank the many researchers and practitioners who provided support and feedback on drafts of this guidance. In particular we would like to thank the Advisory Panel and Evidence Review Group:Advisory Panel: Professor Judith Bennett (University of York), Lia Commissar (Wellcome Trust), Professor Harrie Eijkelhof (Universiteit Utrecht), Dr Niki Kaiser (Norwich Research School, Notre Dame High School), and Lauren Stephenson (Blackpool Research School, St. Mary s Catholic Academy).Evidence Review Group: Dr Andri Christodoulou, Professor Marcus Grace, Professor Janice Griffiths, Dr Carys Hughes, and Willeke Rietdijk (all University of Southampton).Peer Reviewers: Professor Michael J Reiss (UCL Institute of Education), and Professor Ian Abrahams (University of Lincoln)Guidance report authors: Sir John Holman (University of York) and Emily Yeomans (Education Endowment Foundation).

pupils feel that science is something they can achieve in, whatever their background. As a science teacher, you have two big advantages. The first is that science is a practical subject. When the Wellcome Trust asked pupils what made school science enjoyable, the leading reasons turned out to be having a good teacher and enjoying practical work.9

Loading..

Tags:

  Practical, Sciences, Improving, Work, Secondary, Practical work, Improving secondary science

Information

Related search queries