Transcription of The Journal’s Role in Scientific Misconduct - ORI
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: marketing
The Journal’s Role in Scientific Misconduct - ORI
Proceedings of the retreat on The Journal s Role in Scientific Misconduct A council of Science Editors retreat with funding from the Office of Research Integrity 7-9 November 2003 Lansdowne Resort and Conference Center Lansdowne, Virginia Retreat cochairs Jessica Ancker Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials Network Dept. of Biostatistics, Columbia University Faith McLellan The Lancet Proceedings recorder and editor Jessica Ancker Contents Introduction 1 Dealing with Suspected Misconduct from the Journal editor s Perspective 1 Catherine D DeAngelis, editor , JAMA .. 1 Richard Horton, editor , The Lancet .. 2 Dealing with Suspected Misconduct from the Point of View of Academe, Oversight and Advisory Bodies, and Regulatory Agencies 3 C K (Tina) Gunsalus, Special Counsel, Office of the University Counsel, University of Illinois at 3 Alan Price, Associate Director, Office of Research 4 James T (Jim) Kroll, Head of Administrative Investigations, National Science Foundation.
Proceedings of the retreat on The Journal’s Role in Scientific Misconduct A Council of Science Editors retreat with funding from the Office of Research Integrity
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: