REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL …
in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal nos. 843-844 of 2021 (arising out of slp (c) no. 1531-32/ 2021) bharat sanchar nigam ltd. & anr. …appellants versus m/s nortel networks india pvt. ltd. …respondent j u d g m e n t indu malhotra, j. leave granted. 1.
Tags:
Court, Appeal, Supreme, Nigam, Bharat, Sanchar, Bharat sanchar nigam ltd, The supreme court
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document:
Documents from same domain
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ...
main.sci.gov.inCrl.A.@SLP(Crl.)No.5438 of 2020 Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. As they have pleaded that they were innocent and they have been falsely implicated, they were tried for the aforesaid offences in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari, in Sessions Case No.32 of …
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE …
main.sci.gov.inInsolvency Resolution Process and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional. Consequently, a Moratorium was also declared in terms of Section 14 of the IBC, 2016. iii) At that time, the Corporate Debtor held a mining lease granted by the Government of Karnataka, which was to expire by 25.05.2018.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ...
main.sci.gov.inMaintenance filed in a petition u/S. 125 Cr.P.C. by the Respondent-wife and minor son. The Respondent No.1-wife left the matrimonial home in January 2013, shortly after the birth of the son-Respondent No.2. On 02.09.2013, the wife filed an application for interim maintenance u/S. 125 Cr.P.C. on behalf of herself and the minor son.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL …
main.sci.gov.in2 J U D G M E N T A.M. Khanwilkar, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS S.NO. TOPIC PARAS 1. Introduction 1 2. Objectives of the Project 2-10 3. Proceedings and Contentions of the
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ...
main.sci.gov.inIndia rejected the mercy petition on 01.02.2020 and the same was ... Govt. of NCT of Delhi under the Right to Information Act, 2005 and ... the two Articles. The President or the Governor, as the case may be, in exercise of power under Articles 72/161 respectively, may examine the
Information, Under, Rights, Right to information act, Rejected
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL …
main.sci.gov.inat Orissa. He further submits that the OL has incurred heavy expenses in protecting the factory premises at Orissa in the given facts and circumstances. 4. The Ex. Management however objects to transfer of this petition. They have submitted that they have had no opportunity to defend the proceedings before NCLT. 5.
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL …
main.sci.gov.inthe disinvestment of the shareholding of the Union overnment in other G government companies – namely, Engineers India Limited, National Fertilizers Limited and Burn Standard Company Limited13.The dismissal of these petitions followed upon affidavits filed on 14 December 2005, 27 July 2005 and 18 August 2005stating that
Criminal Matters - Matters challenging prosecution under ...
main.sci.gov.inIndirect Taxes Matters - Appeals u/s 35 L of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. 106 C.A. No. 10409-10410/2014 III M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. RAHUL JAIN[P-1] Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1] K. R. SASIPRABHU[INT] [ LIST THESE APPEAL IN THE FOURTH WEEK OF NOVEMBER ,2021 …
[DEFAULT / OTHER MATTERS] [SERVICE/COMPLIANCE] …
main.sci.gov.inRegistrar Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) 24 SLP(C) No. 12791-12792/2021 IV-C THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE Versus VINODPURI AND ORS. ASWATHI M.K.[R-1], [R-2], ASHUTOSH GHADE[R-4] 25 SLP(C) No. 13102/2021 IV-A KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LTD. AND ORS. HETU ARORA SETHI …
SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) NO.1 OF 2020 IN RE ...
main.sci.gov.inexpressed regret in the other proceedings, there is no reason as to why he should not express regret in the present proceedings also. He stated that the same could be considered as regret in the present proceedings also. We had also pointed out to the learned Attorney General that the
Related documents
A guide to bringing a case to The Supreme Court - The ...
www.supremecourt.ukThe Supreme Court is an appeal court1. This means that it only deals with appeals from In England and Wales The Court of Appeal, Civil Division The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division (in some limited cases2) the High Court In Scotland The Court of Session In Northern Ireland
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL …
ibbi.gov.inIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8766-67 OF 2019 DIARY NO.24417 OF 2019 Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited Through Authorised Signatory ...Appellant Versus Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. ...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5634-5635 OF 2019 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5636 …
MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT Adopted by Administrative …
courts.ms.govmust state the reason for the denial. A person who is denied access to a record may appeal within 14 days of the date of notice of denial by filing a written request for review with the Supreme Court Administrator, Post Office Box 117, Jackson, MS 39205-0117.
Court, Appeal, Administrative, Supreme, Adopted, Mississippi, The supreme court, Mississippi supreme court adopted by administrative
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ...
main.sci.gov.in1 reportable in the supreme court of india criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal no. 452 of 2020 (arising out of slp (crl.) no.2433/2020)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govThe California Supreme Court affirmed. The court unanimously agreed with the Court of Appeal on the issue of general jurisdiction, but the court was divided on the question of specific jurisdiction. The majority applied a “sliding scale approach to specific jurisdiction.” 1 Cal. 5th, at 806, 377 P. 3d, at 889. Under this approach, “the more
United, States, Court, Appeal, Supreme, Supreme court of the united states, Supreme court, Court of appeals
B SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . No. 21A90 . JOHN DOES 1–3, ET AL. v. JANET T. MILLS, GOVERNOR OF MAINE, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF [October 29, 2021] J USTICE G ORSUCH, with whom J USTICE T HOMAS and J USTICE A LITO join, dissenting from the denial of applica-tion for injunctive relief. Maine has adopted a …