Example: stock market
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL …
Court of India’s decision in Reliance Industries Ltd v. Union of India (2014) 7 SCC 603 (Exhibit CLM-3) is a leading authority. This has been confirmed by the Supreme Court of India in Sasan Power Limited v. North American Coal Corporation India Private Limited (2016) 10 SCC 813 (RL-6), which at an earlier
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Documents from same domain
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL …
main.sci.gov.in(e) Nortel filed an application under Section 11 of the 1996 Act before the Kerala High Court for appointment of an arbitrator. The High Court vide Order dated 13.10.2020 referred the disputes to arbitration. (f) BSNL filed a review petition before the High Court, which was dismissed vide Order dated 14.01.2021.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ...
main.sci.gov.inCrl.A.@SLP(Crl.)No.5438 of 2020 Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. As they have pleaded that they were innocent and they have been falsely implicated, they were tried for the aforesaid offences in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari, in Sessions Case No.32 of …
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE …
main.sci.gov.inInsolvency Resolution Process and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional. Consequently, a Moratorium was also declared in terms of Section 14 of the IBC, 2016. iii) At that time, the Corporate Debtor held a mining lease granted by the Government of Karnataka, which was to expire by 25.05.2018.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ...
main.sci.gov.inMaintenance filed in a petition u/S. 125 Cr.P.C. by the Respondent-wife and minor son. The Respondent No.1-wife left the matrimonial home in January 2013, shortly after the birth of the son-Respondent No.2. On 02.09.2013, the wife filed an application for interim maintenance u/S. 125 Cr.P.C. on behalf of herself and the minor son.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL …
main.sci.gov.in2 J U D G M E N T A.M. Khanwilkar, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS S.NO. TOPIC PARAS 1. Introduction 1 2. Objectives of the Project 2-10 3. Proceedings and Contentions of the
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ...
main.sci.gov.inIndia rejected the mercy petition on 01.02.2020 and the same was ... Govt. of NCT of Delhi under the Right to Information Act, 2005 and ... the two Articles. The President or the Governor, as the case may be, in exercise of power under Articles 72/161 respectively, may examine the
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL …
main.sci.gov.inat Orissa. He further submits that the OL has incurred heavy expenses in protecting the factory premises at Orissa in the given facts and circumstances. 4. The Ex. Management however objects to transfer of this petition. They have submitted that they have had no opportunity to defend the proceedings before NCLT. 5.
Criminal Matters - Matters challenging prosecution under ...
main.sci.gov.inIndirect Taxes Matters - Appeals u/s 35 L of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. 106 C.A. No. 10409-10410/2014 III M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. RAHUL JAIN[P-1] Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1] K. R. SASIPRABHU[INT] [ LIST THESE APPEAL IN THE FOURTH WEEK OF NOVEMBER ,2021 …
![[DEFAULT / OTHER MATTERS] [SERVICE/COMPLIANCE] …](/cache/preview/4/8/a/c/d/7/0/e/thumb-48acd70e206083f8f3d37421a64ec859.jpg)
[DEFAULT / OTHER MATTERS] [SERVICE/COMPLIANCE] …
main.sci.gov.inRegistrar Court No. 1 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) 24 SLP(C) No. 12791-12792/2021 IV-C THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE Versus VINODPURI AND ORS. ASWATHI M.K.[R-1], [R-2], ASHUTOSH GHADE[R-4] 25 SLP(C) No. 13102/2021 IV-A KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LTD. AND ORS. HETU ARORA SETHI …
SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) NO.1 OF 2020 IN RE ...
main.sci.gov.inexpressed regret in the other proceedings, there is no reason as to why he should not express regret in the present proceedings also. He stated that the same could be considered as regret in the present proceedings also. We had also pointed out to the learned Attorney General that the
Related documents
Rule 1.5.1 Fee Divisions Among Lawyers (Rule Approved by ...
www.calbar.ca.govThe Board adopted proposed rule 1.5.1 at its November 17, 2016 meeting. Supreme Court Action (May 10, 2018) The Supreme Court approved the rule as modified by the Court to be effective November 1, 2018. In the enumerated list in subparagraph (a)(2), semicolons were substituted for commas.
Rule 1.5 Fees for Legal Services (Rule Approved by the ...
www.calbar.ca.govThe Board adopted proposed rule 1.5 at its March 9, 2017 meeting. Supreme Court Action (May 10, 2018) The Supreme Court approved the rule as modified by the Court to be effective November 1, 2018. An omitted asterisk for a defined term was added.
State Bar of Michigan: Civil Discovery Rules Guidebook ...
www.michbar.orgThe Michigan Supreme Court submitted it for public comment in November 2018 and later adopted it, effective January 1, 2020. Many thanks are due to everyone involved in this lengthy process, from the members of the Special Committee to those who provided feedback to those
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF THE …
www.supremecourt.govSupreme Court Rule 29.7, and are effective beginning November 13, 2017. 1. Electronic Submission Requirement. Filings submitted by parties represented by counsel (with the exception of material addressed in paragraphs 7, 9 and 14 below) must be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system.
Supreme Court of Texas
www.txcourts.govand remote court proceedings under this Order. 10. This Order is effective immediately and expires February 1, 2022 , except as otherwise stated herein, unless extended by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
The The Texas Judicial System Texas ... - txcourts.gov
www.txcourts.govThe Chief Justice of the Supreme Court convenes periodic conferences of the nine Presiding Judges to ensure the efficient administration of justice in the trial courts of the State. 20 1 The Texas Judicial System Judicial Authority The judicial power of the State of Texas is derived from Article 5, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution, which ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
www.supremecourt.govnotify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash-ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Nos. 21A240 and 21A241 . JOSEPH R. BIDEN, J. R., PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL