Transcription of Stufflebeam's (IPP Evaluation Model Defining Evaluation
{{id}} {{{paragraph}}}
Example: dental hygienist
Stufflebeam's (IPP Evaluation Model Defining Evaluation
CHAPTER 10 Evaluation in Instructional Design: A Comparison of Evaluation Models 97. the 1960s and early 1970s, all had an Evaluation compo- Scriven (1980) also provides a "logic of Evaluation ". nent. Most included the formative /summative distinction that includes four steps. First, select the criteria of merit or and suggested that designers engage in some process in worth. Second, set specific performance standards ( , the which drafts of instructional materials are studied by learn- level of performance required) for your criteria. Third, col- ers and data are obtained on learners' performance on tests lect performance data and compare the level of observed and their reactions to the instruction.
will be effective. Formative evaluation in instructional design should include an SME review, and that of an edi tor, but the major source of input to this process is the learner. Formative evaluation focuses on learners' ability to learn from the …
Loading..
Tags:
Information
Domain:
Source:
Link to this page:
Please notify us if you found a problem with this document: